Tag Archives: CC 600


Kill Zone Theory Only Applies When Defendant Tried to Kill Everyone in the “Kill Zone” -– Correlation Between Number of Victims and Shots Fired or Existence of A Primary Target — Is Not Alone Determinative
July 7th, 2016

The kill zone theory applies where the defendant attempts to kill an entire group of people in order to kill a specific victim. Because the defendant acts with the specific intent to kill everyone in the victim’s vicinity he is guilty of attempted murder of each member of the group. (See FORECITE F 600.2 Inst […]


Tags: ,


Attempted Murder: Kill Zone Language
July 17th, 2015

  People v. Campos (2007) 156 Cal. App. 4th 1228, 1243, upheld instructing the jury with the “kill zone” option of CC 600. However, the Campos court observed that when a jury is instructed on the intent to murder the person whose attempted murder is charged and on express malice, the “kill zone” option is […]


Tags: ,


California Supreme Court Poised to Weigh In Again on the “Kill Zone” Doctrine.
March 30th, 2015

  In People v. Canizales, S221958 (E054056; 229 CA 4th 820) the defendant filed a petition for review which framed the question presented as follows:   In a criminal case charging attempted murder of a victim who was not killed or even injured, is it error to instruct the jury with a kill-zone instruction if […]


Tags: ,


Attempted Murder
January 30th, 2014

  Attempted Murder: Revision Of Attempted Murder Instruction Per People v. Stone (2009) 46 Cal. 4th 131   The committee revised CC 600, Attempted Murder, in accordance with People v. Stone (2009) 46 Cal. 4th 131. In Stone, the Supreme Court made a direct suggestion to improve the language of CC 600 regarding the kill […]


Tags: ,


Attempted Murder: Intent
January 30th, 2014

  People v. Ramos (2011) 193 Cal. App. 4th 43, 47, concluded that CC 600 adequately instructs jurors on the intent required for attempted murder. Its language is virtually identical to CJ 8.66, except that CC 600 does not reference “malice aforethought” in defining murder. The Court of Appeal held that, “To instruct on the […]


Tags: ,