| F 101.1 Inst 1 |
Reference To Juror By Number Without Showing Of Good Cause Under CCP 237 (Los Angeles County Procedure) |
| F 101.1 Inst 2 |
Reference To Juror By Number Based On Showing Of Good Cause Under CCP 237 |
| F 101 Note 7 |
Juror Experiments During Trial Or Deliberations
|
| F 105.2 Inst 2 |
Listed Factors Are Not Exclusive; Consider Relevant Factors; Do Not Consider Irrelevant Factors |
| F 105.3.14 |
No Limitation On Consideration Of Punishment Of Witness Granted Immunity/Leniency |
| F 200.1.2 Note 2 |
Whether Written Instructions Should Include Descriptive Titles |
| F 204 Inst 3 (a-f) |
Cautionary Instruction: Courtroom Security |
| F 306 Note 4 |
Untimely Discovery: CJ 2.28 Disapproved |
| F 315 Note 18 |
New Jersey Supreme Court Issues Major Decision On Eyewitness Identifications |
| F 315 Note 19 |
The Manson v. Brathwaite (1977) 432 US 98 Test Needs To Be Revised |
| F 315 Note 20 |
Factors Affecting Reliability Of Eyewitness Identification |
| F 315 Note 21 |
Eyewitness: Need For “Enhanced” Jury Instructions |
| F 316(¶ A) Note 7 |
Moral Turpitude Properly Defined In Terms Of "Readiness To Do Evil" |
| F 358 Note 13 |
Defendant’s Unrecorded Out-Of-Court Statement: Sua Sponte Requirement |
| F 362.2 Inst 6 |
Consciousness Of Guilt Only Applicable To False Statements Made Before Trial |
| F 362 Note 6 |
False Statement Instruction As Prosecution Pinpoint Instruction |
| F 370 Inst 11 |
Challenge To Motive Instruction As Argumentative And Confusing |
| F 371(A-2) Inst 4 |
Suppression of Evidence: Limitation To Applicable Co-Defendant |
| F 371(A-2) Inst 5 |
Suppression of Evidence: Jury Not To Consider Suppression By Uncharged Accomplice As To Defendant |
| F 371(C-2) Inst 5 |
Suppression of Evidence By Third Party: Jury Not To Consider Suppression By Uncharged Accomplice As To Defendant |
| F 372.1 Inst 6 |
Flight Instruction: Objection By Defendant Precludes Cautionary/Limiting Instruction Which Benefits The Defendant |
| F 372.2 Inst 4 |
Flight: Limitation To Applicable Co-Defendant |
| F 372.2 Inst 7 |
Flight Not Applicable To Use Of A Vehicle To Evade Arrest (VC 2800.1 & 2800.2) |
| F 372.4 Inst 2 |
Flight – Application To Third Party |
| F 372 Note 7 |
Defendant Should Be Able To Waive Giving Of Flight Instruction Since Its Purpose Is To Protect The Defendant |
| F 372 Note 10 |
Consciousness Of Guilt As Improper Comment On The Evidence |
| F 372 Note 13 |
Merely Leaving A Location Does Not Justify A Flight Instruction |
| F 400 Note 13 |
Propriety Of Pinpoint Instruction On Factors Relevant To Aiding And Abetting |
| F 401.3 Inst 4 |
Jurors Should Consider Presence Or Absence Of The Defendant As To Aiding And Abetting |
| F 416.3 Inst 4 |
Improper Argumentative And Duplicative Reference To Matters Which The Prosecution Does "Not Have To Prove" |
| F 416.3 Inst 7 |
Argumentative Language Should Be Balanced To Assure Jurors Consider All Relevant Evidence |
| F 460 Note 2 |
Attempt Instruction Restates Common Meaning Of Attempt
|
| F 570.4 Inst 2 |
Voluntary Manslaughter: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language |
| F 571 Note 4 |
Imperfect Self-Defense: Instruction Warranted If Ordinary Self-Defense Instruction Is Warranted |
| F 600.5 Inst 2 (a & b) |
Attempted Murder: Modification Of "Killing Zone" Instruction |
| F 725 Note 6 |
2004 Enlargement Of Witness-Murder Statute Should Not Apply To Pre-Enlargement Cases |
| F 821.6 Inst 1 (a & b) |
Parental Discipline As Defense Theory |
| F 823 Note 13 |
Felony Child Abuse: Parental Discipline And Self Defense As Potential Defenses |
| F 1000.6 Inst 8 |
Pre-Penetration Withdrawal Of Consent Must Be Communicated Through Word Or Act |
| F 1111.5 Inst 3 |
Lewd Act With Child: Definition Of Duress |
| F 1400 Note 24 |
Gang Enhancement And Use Of Firearm |
| F 1600.5 Inst 8 |
Robbery: Victim’s Fear Must Be Objectively Reasonable |
| F 2180 Note 2 |
Evading Police Officer Requires Specific Intent |
| F 2300.6 Inst 4 |
Minimal Movement Within A Residence Or Confined Area Is Not Transportation |
| F 3115 Note 16 |
Gang Enhancement And Use Of Firearm |
| F 3308 Note 24 |
Collateral Estoppel: Not Applicable Against Defendant If Factual Determination Is Not Final |
| F 3517 Inst 3 |
Jury Should Be Instructed Upon Partial Verdict |
| F 3518 Note 2 |
Jury Should Be Instructed Upon Partial Verdict |
| F 3530 Note 4 |
Improper For Trial Judge To Direct Jury To Matters Adverse To The Defense In Guise Of "Comment On The Evidence" |
| F 3550 Inst 9 |
No Limitation On Consideration Of Punishment Of Witness Granted Immunity/Leniency |
