Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

SERIES 1400 CRIMINAL STREET GANGS

F 1402 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement (PC 12022.53(e))

TABLE OF CONTENTS
F 1402.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
F 1402.1 Inst 1 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Title
F 1402.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant

F 1402.2 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
F 1402.2 Inst 1 Pattern Of Criminal Gang Activity: Tailor To Facts

F 1402.3 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
F 1402.3 Inst 1 Jurors Not Required To Decide
F 1402.3 Inst 2 Deletion Of Argumentative Language

F 1402.4 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Burden Of Proof Issues
F 1402.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements

F 1402.5 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Elements And Definitions
F 1402.5 Inst 1 Offense Must Occur During Hours School Is Open
F 1402.5 Inst 2 Incorporate Definition In Elements And Tailor: Personally Uses
F 1402.5 Inst 3 Incorporate Definitional Elements Of Causation In Enumerated Elements

F 1402.6 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Defense Theories [Reserved]

F 1402.7 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]

F 1402.8 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]

F 1402.9 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]

F 1402 Notes
F 1402 Note 1 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes

See generally FORECITE F 200.1.2 Note 2, CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-002, CCM-003, and CCM-004.


F 1402.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties

F 1402.1 Inst 1 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Title

See generally FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-005 and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-006.


F 1402.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant

See generally FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-005 and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-006.


F 1402.2Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories

F 1402.2 Inst 1 Pattern Of Criminal Gang Activity: Tailor To Facts

See FORECITE F 1401.2 Inst 1.


F 1402.3 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.

F 1402.3 Inst 1 Jurors Not Required To Decide

See FORECITE F 1401.3 Inst 1.


F 1402.3 Inst 2 Deletion Of Argumentative Language

*Modify CC 1402, paragraph 6, as follows [deleted language is stricken]:

[A firearm does not need to be in working order if it was designed to shoot and appears capable of shooting.] [A firearm does not need to be loaded.]

Points and Authorities

See FORECITE F 416.3 Inst 4.


F 1402.4 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Burden Of Proof Issues

F 1402.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements

See FORECITE F 400.4 Inst 1.


F 1402.5 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Elements And Definitions

F 1402.5 Inst 1 Offense Must Occur During Hours School Is Open

See FORECITE F 1401.5 Inst 1.


F 1402.5 Inst 2 Incorporate Definition In Elements And Tailor: Personally Uses

*Replace CC 1402, Element 1, with the following:

1. _______________ <name of alleged principal> was a principal in the crime. To prove this the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt either that:

A. _______________ <name of alleged principal> [directly committed] [or] [attempted to commit] the crime;

OR

B. _______________ <name of alleged principal> aided and abetted [someone else] [_______________ <name of perpetrator>] who committed the crime;

AND

2. _______________ <name of alleged principal> personally [displayed a firearm in a menacing manner/[or] hit _______________ <name of person hit> with a firearm/[or] fired a firearm];

Points and Authorities

Incorporation Of Definition—See FORECITE F 417.5 Inst 2.

Tailor To Facts: Persons—See FORECITE F 400.2 Inst 1.

Tailor To Facts: Prosecution Theories—See FORECITE F 400.2 Inst 1.


F 1402.5 Inst 3 Incorporate Definitional Elements Of Causation In Enumerated Elements

See FORECITE F 1551.5 Inst 7.


F 1402.6 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Defense Theories [Reserved]


F 1402.7 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]


F 1402.8 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity[Reserved]


F 1402.9 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]


F 1402 NOTES

F 1402 Note 1 Gang-Related Firearm Enhancement—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes

CALCRIM Cross-References:

See FORECITE F 1400 Note 1.

Research Notes:

See CLARAWEB Forum, Criminal Street Gangs—Series 1400.


F 1402 Note 2 PC 12022.53(e): 10-20-Life For Unarmed Aider And Abettor With Gang Allegation Is Constitutional

See (People v. Gonzales (2001) 87 CA4th 1, 17.

CALJIC NOTE: See FORECITE F 17.15 n10.


F 1402 Note 3 Improper To Instruct On Gang Firearm Enhancement When Gun Was Fired By An Unknown Person

People v. Camino (2010) 188 CA4th 1359, 1381:

“As there exists no shooter in defendant’s group who is (or was) a principal in the offense charged in Count 1, the jury’s finding that defendant vicariously shot a gun during the commission of Palacios’s murder is unsupported by substantial evidence. Defendant asserts instructional error. It is clear the jury was mislead by CALCRIM No. 1402, given the lack of evidentiary support for the enhancement. Possibly the jury was confused by the instruction’s simultaneous coverage of the gun enhancements for both Counts 1 and 2, and by the prosecutor’s statement in his closing argument that Palacios was “one of the principals in the crime….” The error was prejudicial as it is reasonably probable the jury would have reached a result more favorable to defendant absent the misleading instruction. (People v. Sengpadychith (2001) 26 Cal.4th 316, 320–321 [109 Cal.Rptr.2d 851, 27 P.3d 739] [failure to instruct on element of enhancement is subject to People v. Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, 836 [299 P.2d 243], harmless error standard, if associated crime is punishable by indeterminate term of life imprisonment].)


F 1402 Note 4 Instructions Should Assure That Jurors Understand Which Counts Require Defendant To Personally Use A Firearm

CC 1402 applies to a firearm use under PC 12022.53(a) which only requires that “a principal” use a firearm. In cases where there are also counts in which it is alleged that the defendant personally used a firearm per PC 12022.53(b) the instructions should assure the jurors understand that they must find personal use as required by CC 3146. (See People v. Mendez (2010) 188 CA4th 47, 59-60.


F 1402 Note 5 Restrictions On Gang Expert Testimony

– In re Frank S. (2006) 141 CA4th 1192, 1199 [testimony that weapon was possessed to benefit a gang improperly comments on an ultimate
issue].

– People v. Ramon (2009) 175 CA4th 843, 853 [improper to testify that crimes were for benefit of the gang based solely on fact that
defendants were gang members who were in their own gang territory].

– In re Alexander (2007) 149 CA4th 605, 611-12 [expert testimony that the gang committed certain unspecified crimes was insufficient to
prove that vandalism was done to benefit the gang].

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES