Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

SERIES 1100 SEX OFFENSES

F 1143 Obscene Live Conduct (PC 311.6)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
F 1143.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
F 1143.1 Inst 1 Obscene Live Conduct —Title
F 1143.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant

F 1143.2 Obscene Live Conduct—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]

F 1143.3 Obscene Live Conduct—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
F 1143.3 Inst 1 Jurors Not Required To Decide
F 1143.3 Inst 2 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
F 1143.3 Inst 3 Argumentative Language Should Be Balanced To Assure Jurors Consider All Relevant Evidence

F 1143.4 Obscene Live Conduct—Burden Of Proof Issues
F 1143.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
F 1143.4 Inst 2 Modification Of Burden Shifting Language

F 1143.5 Obscene Live Conduct—Elements And Definitions
F 1143.5 Inst 1 Reasonable Person Standard

F 1143.6 Obscene Live Conduct—Defense Theories [Reserved]

F 1143.7 Obscene Live Conduct—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]

F 1143.8 Obscene Live Conduct—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]

F 1143.9 Obscene Live Conduct—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]

F 1143 Notes
F 1143 Note 1 Obscene Live Conduct—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
F 1143 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment

F 1143 Note 3 Law Enforcement Agent Defense: Prosecution Required To Disprove Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Because The Defense Relates To Defendant’s Conduct

Return to Series 1100 Table of Contents.


F 1143.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties

F 1143.1 Inst 1 Obscene Live Conduct —Title

See generally FORECITE F 200.1.2 Note 2, CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-002, CCM-003, and CCM-004.


F 1143.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant

See generally FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-005 and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-006.


F 1143.2 Obscene Live Conduct—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]


F 1143.3 Obscene Live Conduct—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.

F 1143.3 Inst 1 Jurors Not Required To Decide

*Modify CC 1143, paragraph 3, sentence 1, as follows [added language is underlined]:

You must attempt to decide whether the conduct at issue in this case meets the definition of obscene live conduct.

*Modify CC 1143, paragraph 13, as follows [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:

[In deciding attempting to decide the conduct’s character and whether it lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value, consider . . .

*Modify CC 1143, paragraph 14 and 15, as follows:

[In deciding attempting to decide whether . . .

Points and Authorities

See FORECITE F 100.7 Inst 1.


F 1143.3 Inst 2 Deletion Of Argumentative Language

*Modify CC 1143, paragraph 11, as follows [deleted language is stricken]:

The People must prove that the defendant knew the character of the conduct but do not need to prove that the defendant knew whether the conduct met the definition of obscene.

Points and Authorities

See FORECITE F 1140.3 Inst 1.


F 1143.3 Inst 3 Argumentative Language Should Be Balanced To Assure Jurors Consider All Relevant Evidence

See FORECITE F 1140.3 Inst 2.


F 1143.4 Obscene Live Conduct—Burden Of Proof Issues

F 1143.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements

See FORECITE F 400.4 Inst 1.


F 1143.4 Inst 2 Modification Of Burden Shifting Language

*Modify CC 1143, paragraph 17, as follows [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:

[The defendant is not guilty of this crime if (he/she) was engaging in legitimate medical, scientific, or educational activities. The People have the burden of proving unless the prosecution has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was not acting for a legitimate medical, scientific or educational purpose. If the People have not met this burden, you must find the defendant not guilty of this crime.]

Points and Authorities

See FORECITE F 404.2 Inst 1.


F 1143.5 Obscene Live Conduct—Elements And Definitions

F 1143.5 Inst 1 Reasonable Person Standard

*Modify CC 1143, paragraph 4, item 2, as follows [added language is underlined]:

2. A reasonable person in the same situation, considering all the circumstances as they were known to and appeared to the person at the time, would conclude that it lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value;

*Modify CC 1143, paragraph 8, sentence 1, as follows

The conduct is not obscene unless a reasonable person in the same situation, considering all the circumstances as they were known to and appeared to the person at the time, would conclude that, taken as a whole, it lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

Points and Authorities

See FORECITE F 1140.2 Inst 2.


F 1143.6 Obscene Live Conduct—Defense Theories[Reserved]


F 1143.7 Obscene Live Conduct—Preliminary Fact Issues[Reserved]


F 1143.8 Obscene Live Conduct—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity[Reserved]


F 1143.9 Obscene Live Conduct—Lesser Offense Issues[Reserved]


F 1143 NOTES

F 1143 Note 1 Obscene Live Conduct—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes

CALCRIM Cross-References:

See FORECITE F 1140 Notes

See FORECITE F 1141 Notes

See FORECITE F 1142 Notes

CALCRIM 1140 [Showing or Sending Harmful Material to Seduce a Minor]
CALCRIM 1141 [Distributing Obscene Matter Showing Sexual Conduct by a Minor]
CALCRIM 1142 [Distributing or Intending to Distribute Obscene Material]

Research Notes:

See CLARAWEB Forum: CALCRIM Warnings, Sex Offenses—Series 1000.


F 1143 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment

See FORECITE F 1000 Note 5.


F 1143 Note 3 Law Enforcement Agent Defense: Prosecution Required To Disprove Beyond A Reasonable Doubt Because The Defense Relates To Defendant’s Conduct

See FORECITE F 1141 Note 13.

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES