SERIES 1000 SEX OFFENSES
F 1015 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats (PC 288a(c)(2) & (3), (k))
TABLE OF CONTENTS
F 1015.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
F 1015.1 Inst 1 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Title
F 1015.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
F 1015.2 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
F 1015.3 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
F 1015.4 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Burden Of Proof Issues
F 1015.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
F 1015.4 Inst 2 Consent: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language; Include In Element 3
F 1015.4 Inst 3 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
F 1015.4 Inst 4 Modification Required Where ID At Issue
F 1015.5 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Elements And Definitions
F 1015.5 Inst 1Victim Alive As Element
F 1015.5 Inst 2 Definition Of Kidnap And False Imprisonment
F 1015.5 Inst 3 Alternative 4A: Include Definitions In Elements
F 1015.5 Inst 4 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Oral Copulation In Description Of Elements
F 1015.5 Inst 5 Proof Necessary To Establish Element Of Fear (PC 26)
F 1015.5 Inst 6 Forcible Sex Offenses: Definition Of Duress
F 1015.6 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Defense Theories
F 1015.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
F 1015.6 Inst 2 Prior “Dating” Relationship Should Not Be Ignored (PC 261.6)
F 1015.6 Inst 3 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
F 1015.7 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
F 1015.8 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
F 1015.9 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
F 1015 Notes
F 1015 Note 1 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
F 1015 Note 2 Oral Copulation: Slight Contact (PC 288a)
Return to Series 1000 Table of Contents.
F 1015.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
F 1015.1 Inst 1 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Title
See generally FORECITE F 200.1.2 Note 2, CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-002, CCM-003, and CCM-004.
F 1015.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
See generally FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-005 and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-006.
F 1015.2 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
F 1015.3 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.[Reserved]
F 1015.4 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Burden Of Proof Issues
F 1015.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
See FORECITE F 400.4 Inst 1.
F 1015.4 Inst 2 Consent: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language; Include In Element 3
*Modify CC 1015, Element 2, as follows [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:
2. The other person _______________ <name of alleged victim> did not, knowing the nature of the act, freely and voluntarily consent to the act;
[Delete definition of consent later in instruction.]
Points and Authorities
See FORECITE F 1000.4 Inst 2.
F 1015.4 Inst 3Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
See FORECITE F 1000.4 Inst 5.
F 1015.4 Inst 4 Modification Required Where ID At Issue
*Modify CC 1015, paragraph 8, sentence 2 as follows [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:
When deciding whether the act was accomplished by duress, consider all the circumstances, including the age of the other person and (his/her) relationship to the defendant perpetrator.]
Points and Authorities
See FORECITE F 1000.4 Inst 6.
F 1015.5 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Elements And Definitions
F 1015.5 Inst 1Victim Alive As Element
See FORECITE F 1000.5 Inst 5.
F 1015.5 Inst 2Definition Of Kidnap And False Imprisonment
See FORECITE F 1000.5 Inst 6.
F 1015.5 Inst 3 Alternative 4A: Include Definitions In Elements
See FORECITE F 1000.5 Inst 7.
F 1015.5 Inst 4 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Oral Copulation In Description Of Elements
*Replace CC 1015, Element 1, as follows:
1. [The defendant’s mouth made contact with the [sexual organ] [or] [anus] of_______________ <name of alleged victim>] [or] [_______________’s <name of alleged victim> mouth made contact with the defendant’s [sexual organ] [or] [anus]];
Points and Authorities
See FORECITE F 1000.5 Inst 2.
F 1015.5 Inst 5 Proof Necessary To Establish Element Of Fear (PC 26)
See FORECITE F 1000.5 Inst 8.
F 1015.5 Inst 6 Forcible Sex Offenses: Definition Of Duress
See FORECITE F 1111.5 Inst 2.
F 1015.6 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Defense Theories
F 1015.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
See FORECITE F 1000.6 Inst 3.
F 1015.6 Inst 2 Prior “Dating” Relationship Should Not Be Ignored (PC 261.6)
See FORECITE F 1000.6 Inst 7.
F 1015.6 Inst 3 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
See FORECITE F 1000.6 Inst 4.
F 1015.7 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Preliminary Fact Issues[Reserved]
F 1015.8 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity[Reserved]
F 1015.9 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Lesser Offense Issues[Reserved]
F 1015 NOTES
F 1015 Note 1 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
CALCRIM Cross-References:
See FORECITE F 1000 Notes.
CALCRIM 1016 [Oral Copulation in Concert]
CALCRIM 1017 [Oral Copulation of an Intoxicated Person]
CALCRIM 1018 [Oral Copulation of an Unconscious Person]
CALCRIM 1019 [Oral Copulation of a Disabled Person]
CALCRIM 1020 [Oral Copulation of a Disabled Person in a Mental Hospital]
CALCRIM 1021 [Oral Copulation by Fraud]
Research Notes:
See CLARAWEB Forum: CALCRIM Warnings, Sex Offenses—Series 1000.
F 1015 Note 2 Oral Copulation: Slight Contact (PC 288a)
Compare People v. Angier (1941) 44 CA2d 417, 419 [fact that “copulation,” the word chosen by the legislature, implies actual joining of the mouth (or tongue) with a sexual organ; brief or transitory contact is not “copulation”] and Witkin and Epstein, California Criminal Law (2 Ed. 1988) § 784, pp. 885-86) with People v. Grim (1992) 9 CA4th 1240, 1242 and People v. Catelli (1991) 227 CA3d 1434, 1450 fn 7.
CALJIC NOTE: See FORECITE F 10.10e.
