Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

SERIES 1000 SEX OFFENSES

  • A. AGAINST ADULT OR MINOR
  • (i) Rape
  • F 1000 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats (PC 261(a)(2), (6) & (7))
  • F 1000.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1000.1 Inst 1 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Title
    • F 1000.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1000.2 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1000.2 Inst 1 Element 1: Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sexual Intercourse In Description Of Element
    • F 1000.2 Inst 2 Element 2: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1000.2 Inst 3 Element 4: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1000.2 Inst 4 Definition Of Consent: Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1000.2 Inst 5 Instruction Should Be Tailored Or Modified To Eliminate Improper Use of The Term “Woman”
  • F 1000.3 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1000.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
    • F 1000.3 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—Deletion Of Prior “Dating” Relationship
    • F 1000.3 Inst 3 Forcible Sex Offenses: Prior “Dating” Relationship Should Not Be Ignored (PC 261.6)
  • F 1000.4 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1000.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1000.4 Inst 2 Consent: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language; Include In Element 3
    • F 1000.4 Inst 3 (a & b) Forcible Sex Offenses: Modification Of Consent Element When Prosecution Alleges Consent Was Withdrawn During The Intercourse
    • F 1000.4 Inst 4 Reasonable Belief In Consent: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language; Objective Reasonable Person Standard
    • F 1000.4 Inst 5 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
    • F 1000.4 Inst 6 Modification Required Where ID At Issue
  • F 1000.5 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1000.5 Inst 1 Element 1: Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sexual Intercourse In Description Of Element
    • F 1000.5 Inst 2 Element 4A (Force Or Fear): Include Material Definition
    • F 1000.5 Inst 3 Withdrawal Of Consent: Reasonable Person Standard
    • F 1000.5 Inst 4 Duress: Reasonable Person Standard
    • F 1000.5 Inst 5 Victim Alive As Element
    • F 1000.5 Inst 6 Definition Of Kidnap And False Imprisonment
    • F 1000.5 Inst 7 Alternative 4A: Include Definitions In Elements
    • F 1000.5 Inst 8 Proof Necessary To Establish Element Of Fear (PC 26)
    • F 1000.5 Inst 9 Forcible Sex Offenses: Definition Of Duress
  • F 1000.6 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Defense Theories
    • F 1000.6 Inst 1 (a & b) Forcible Sex Offenses: Modification Of Consent Element When Prosecution Alleges Consent Was Withdrawn During The Intercourse
    • F 1000.6 Inst 2 Withdrawal Of Consent: Reasonable Person Standard
    • F 1000.6 Inst 3 Duress: Reasonable Person Standard
    • F 1000.6 Inst 4 Reasonable Belief In Consent: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language; Objective Reasonable Person Standard
    • F 1000.6 Inst 5 (a & b) Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
    • F 1000.6 Inst 6 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—Deletion Of Prior “Dating” Relationship
    • F 1000.6 Inst 7 Forcible Sex Offenses: Prior “Dating” Relationship Should Not Be Ignored (PC 261.6)
    • F 1000.6 Inst 8 Pre-Penetration Withdrawal Of Consent Must Be Communicated Through Word Or Act
  • F 1000.7 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1000.8 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Unanimity/ Duplicity/ Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1000.9 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1000 NOTES
    • F 1000 Note 1 Rape Or Spousal Rape By Force, Fear, Or Threats—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1000 Note 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: Belief As To Consent—Evidence Necessary To Warrant Instruction
    • F 1000 Note 3 Forcible Sex Offenses: Belief As To Consent—Jury Should Consider Defendant’s Intoxication
    • F 1000 Note 4 Forcible Sex Offenses: Definition Of Duress And Menace—No Sua Sponte Duty
    • F 1000 Note 5 Sex Crimes: Entrapment (PC 261 & PC 263)
    • F 1000 Note 6 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—PC 261.6 Violates Due Process As Contrary To The Common Law
    • F 1000 Note 7 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—PC 261.6 Violates Due Process As Irrebuttable Presumption
    • F 1000 Note 8 Forcible Sex Offenses: Belief As To Consent—The “Equivocal Conduct” Limitation On The Defense Of Reasonable Good Faith Belief Is Violative Of Due Process (PC 261 & PC 263)
    • F 1000 Note 9 Forcible Sex Offenses: Failure To Give Good Faith Consent Instruction Sua Sponte As Reversible Error
    • F 1000 Note 10 Spousal Rape: No Constitutional Violation For Failure To Include Cohabitants Of The Same Sex
    • F 1000 Note 11 Assault With Intent To Rape Not LIO Of Attempted Rape
    • F 1000 Note 12 Defendant Need Not Testify To Obtain Mayberry Instruction
  • F 1001 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert (PC 264.1)
  • F 1001.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1001.1 Inst 1 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—Title
    • F 1001.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1001.2 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1001.3 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1001.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1001.4 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1001.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
  • F 1001.5 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1001.5 Inst 1 Element Instructions: Rape
    • F 1001.5 Inst 2 (a & b) Incorporation Of Predicate Offense Elements; Separate Enumeration Of Compound Elements
    • F 1001.5 Inst 3 Separate Enumeration Of Compound Elements
    • F 1001.5 Inst 4 Alternative B: Separate Enumeration Of Compound Elements
    • F 1001.5 Inst 5 Rape In Concert—Requirement Of Specific Intent (PC 264.1)
    • F 1001.5 Inst 6 Rape In Concert—Definition Of “In Concert” (PC 264.1)
  • F 1001.6 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—Defense Theories
    • F 1001.6 Inst 1 Defense Theory Instructions: Rape
  • F 1001.7 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1001.8 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1001.9 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1001 NOTES
    • F 1001 Note 1 Rape Or Spousal Rape In Concert—CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
    • F 1001 Note 2 Reference To Related FORECITE Issues
    • F 1001 Note 3 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1002 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse (PC 261(a)(3), 262(a)(2))
  • F 1002.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1002.1 Inst 1 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse —Title
    • F 1002.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1002.2 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1002.2 Inst 1 Element 1: Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sexual Intercourse In Description Of Element
    • F 1002.2 Inst 2 Element 2: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1002.2 Inst 3 Elements 3 and 4: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1002.2 Inst 4 Tailor To Facts: “Prevented From Resisting”—Specification Of “The Act”
  • F 1002.3 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1002.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1002.4 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1002.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1002.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
    • F 1002.4 Inst 3 Improper To Direct Verdict On Element
  • F 1002.5 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1002.5 Inst 1 Victim Alive As Element
    • F 1002.5 Inst 2 (a & b) Rape: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1002.5 Inst 3 Include Definition Of Legal Consent In “Prevented From Resisting” Element
    • F 1002.5 Inst 4 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1002.6 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—Defense Theories
    • F 1002.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
    • F 1002.6 Inst 2 Consent Defined—Deletion Of Prior “Dating” Relationship
    • F 1002.6 Inst 3 Rape By Intoxication: “Prevented From Resisting”—Pinpoint Instruction (PC 261(a)(3)
  • F 1002.7 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1002.8 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1002.9 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1002 NOTES
    • F 1002 Note 1 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
    • F 1002 Note 2 Rape Of Intoxicated Woman Or Spouse—Additional Notes
  • F 1003 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse (PC 261(a)(4), 262(a)(3))
  • F 1003.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1003.1 Inst 1 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse —Title
    • F 1003.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1003.2 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1003.2 Inst 1 Element 1: Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sexual Intercourse In Description Of Element
    • F 1003.2 Inst 2 Element 2: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1003.2 Inst 3 Tailoring To Facts: “Unconscious Of The Nature Of The Act”—Specification Of “The Act”
  • F 1003.3 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1003.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1003.4 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1003.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1003.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1003.5 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1003.5 Inst 1 Victim Alive As Element
    • F 1003.5 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1003.5 Inst 3 Include Definition Of “Unconscious” In Description Of Elements
    • F 1003.5 Inst 4 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1003.6 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse—Defense Theories
    • F 1003.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1003.7 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1003.8 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1003.9 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1003 Notes
    • F 1003 Note 1 Rape Of Unconscious Woman Or Spouse—CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
    • F 1003 Note 2 Rape Of Unconscious Person: Consent Not A Defense
    • F 1003 Note 3 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1004 Rape Of A Disabled Woman (PC 261(a)(1))
  • F 1004.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1004.1 Inst 1 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—Title
    • F 1004.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1004.2 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1004.2 Inst 1 Element 1: Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sexual Intercourse In Description Of Element
    • F 1004.2 Inst 2 Element 2: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1004.2 Inst 3 Tailoring To Facts: “Prevented From Legally Consenting”; Specification Of “The Act”
  • F 1004.3 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1004.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1004.4 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1004.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1004.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1004.5 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1004.5 Inst 1 “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1004.5 Inst 2 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1004.6 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—Defense Theories
    • F 1004.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1004.7 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1004.8 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1004.9 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1004 Notes
    • F 1004 Note 1 Rape Of A Disabled Woman—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1004 Note 2 Additional Notes
    • F 1004 Note 3 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1005 Rape By Fraud (PC 261(a)(5))
  • F 1005.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1005.1 Inst 1 Rape By Fraud—Title
    • F 1005.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1005.2 Rape By Fraud—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1005.2 Inst 1 Element 1: Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sexual Intercourse In Description Of Element
    • F 1005.2 Inst 2 Element 2: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1005.2 Inst 3 Tailoring To Facts: Specification Of Prosecution Theory
  • F 1005.3 Rape By Fraud—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1005.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1005.4 Rape By Fraud—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1005.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1005.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1005.5 Rape By Fraud—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1005.5 Inst 1 Separate Enumeration Of Compound Elements; Intent Element
  • F 1005.6 Rape By Fraud—Defense Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1005.7 Rape By Fraud—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1005.8 Rape By Fraud—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1005.9 Rape By Fraud—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1005 Notes
    • F 1005 Note 1 Rape By Fraud—CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
    • F 1005 Note 2 Additional Notes
    • F 1005 Note 3 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1006–1014 Reserved
  • (ii) Oral Copulation
  • F 1015 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats (PC 288a(c)(2) & (3), (k))
  • F 1015.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1015.1 Inst 1 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Title
    • F 1015.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1015.2 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1015.3 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1015.4 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1015.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1015.4 Inst 2 Consent: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language; Include In Element 3
    • F 1015.4 Inst 3 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
    • F 1015.4 Inst 4 Modification Required Where ID At Issue
  • F 1015.5 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1015.5 Inst 1Victim Alive As Element
    • F 1015.5 Inst 2 Definition Of Kidnap And False Imprisonment
    • F 1015.5 Inst 3 Alternative 4A: Include Definitions In Elements
    • F 1015.5 Inst 4 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Oral Copulation In Description Of Elements
    • F 1015.5 Inst 5 Proof Necessary To Establish Element Of Fear (PC 26)
    • F 1015.5 Inst 6 Forcible Sex Offenses: Definition Of Duress
  • F 1015.6 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Defense Theories
    • F 1015.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
    • F 1015.6 Inst 2 Prior “Dating” Relationship Should Not Be Ignored (PC 261.6)
    • F 1015.6 Inst 3 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
  • F 1015.7 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1015.8 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1015.9 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1015 Notes
    • F 1015 Note 1 Oral Copulation By Force, Fear, Or Threats—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1015 Note 2 Oral Copulation: Slight Contact (PC 288a)
  • F 1015 Revision History and Commentary
  • F 1016 Oral Copulation In Concert (PC 288a(d))
  • F 1016.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1016.1 Inst 1 Oral Copulation In Concert—Title
    • F 1016.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1016.2 Oral Copulation In Concert—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1016.2 Inst 1 Definition Of Consent: Specification Of “The Act”
  • F 1016.3 Oral Copulation In Concert—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1016.4 Oral Copulation In Concert—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1016.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1016.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1016.5 Oral Copulation In Concert—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1016.5 Inst 1 Elements Of Predicate Offense Should Be Included In Elements Of In Concert Instruction
    • F 1016.5 Inst 2 Proof Necessary To Establish Element Of Fear (PC 26)
    • F 1016.5 Inst 3 Forcible Sex Offenses: Acting In Concert—Requirement Of Specific Intent (PC 264.1)
    • F 1016.5 Inst 4 Forcible Sex Offenses: In Concert—Definition Of “In Concert” (PC 264.1)
  • F 1016.6 Oral Copulation In Concert—Defense Theories
    • F 1016.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1016.7 Oral Copulation In Concert—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1016.8 Oral Copulation In Concert—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1016.9 Oral Copulation In Concert—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1016 Notes
    • F 1016 Note 1 Oral Copulation In Concert—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1016 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1017 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person (PC 288a(a), (i))
  • F 1017.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1017.1 Inst 1 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—Title
    • F 1017.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1017.2 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1017.2 Inst 1 Tailor To Facts: “Prevented From Resisting”—Specification Of “The Act”
  • F 1017.3 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1017.4 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1017.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1017.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
    • F 1017.4 Inst 3 Improper To Direct Verdict On Element
  • F 1017.5 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1017.5 Inst 1 Victim Alive As Element
    • F 1017.5 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1017.5 Inst 3 Include Definition Of Legal Consent In “Prevented From Resisting” Element
    • F 1017.5 Inst 4 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Oral Copulation In Description Of Elements
    • F 1017.5 Inst 5 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1017.6 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1017.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
    • F 1017.6 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
    • F 1017.6 Inst 3 Rape By Intoxication: “Prevented From Resisting”—Pinpoint Instruction (PC 261(a)(3)
  • F 1017.7 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1017.8 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1017.9 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1017 Notes
    • F 1017 Note 1 Oral Copulation Of An Intoxicated Person—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
  • F 1018 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person (PC 288a(a), (f))
  • F 1018.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1018.1 Inst 1 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—Title
    • F 1018.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1018.2 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1018.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Unconscious Of The Nature Of The Act”—Specification Of “The Act”
  • F 1018.3 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1018.4 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1018.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1018.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1018.5 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1018.5 Inst 1 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1018.5 Inst 2 Include Definition Of “Unconscious” In Description Of Elements
    • F 1018.5 Inst 3 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Oral Copulation In Description Of Elements
    • F 1018.5 Inst 4 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1018.6 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1018.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1018.7 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1018.8 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1018.9 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1018 Notes
    • F 1018 Note 1 Oral Copulation Of An Unconscious Person—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1018 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1019 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person (PC 288a(a), (g))
  • F 1019.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1019.1 Inst 1 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—Title
    • F 1019.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1019.2 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1019.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Legally Consenting”; Specification Of “The Act”
  • F 1019.3 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1019.4 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1019.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1019.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1019.5 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1019.5 Inst 1 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1019.5 Inst 2 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Oral Copulation In Description Of Elements
    • F 1019.5 Inst 3 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1019.6 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1019.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1019.7 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1019.8 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1019.9 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1019 Notes
    • F 1019 Note 1 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1019 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1020 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital (PC 288a(a), (h))
  • F 1020.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1020.1 Inst 1 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Title
    • F 1020.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1020.2 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1020.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Legally Consenting”; Specification Of “The Act”
  • F 1020.3 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1020.4 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1020.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1020.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1020.5 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1020.5 Inst 1 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1020.5 Inst 2 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Oral Copulation In Description Of Elements
    • F 1020.5 Inst 3 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1020.6 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Defense Theories
    • F 1020.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1020.7 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1020.8 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1020.9 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1020 Notes
    • F 1020 Note 1 Oral Copulation Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1020 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1021 Oral Copulation By Fraud (PC 288a(a), (j))
  • F 1021 Notes
    • F 1021 Note 1 Oral Copulation By Fraud—CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
    • F 1021 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1022 Oral Copulation While In Custody (PC 288a(a), (e))
  • F 1022.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1022.1 Inst 1 Oral Copulation While In Custody—Title
    • F 1022.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1022.2 Oral Copulation While In Custody—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1022.3 Oral Copulation While In Custody—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1022.4 Oral Copulation While In Custody—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1022.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1022.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1022.5 Oral Copulation While In Custody—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1022.5 Inst 1 (a & b) Unlawful Sodomy: Prisoner—Defendant And Victim Must Be Inmates (PC 286(e))
  • F 1022.6 Oral Copulation While In Custody—Defense Theories
    • F 1022.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1022.7 Oral Copulation While In Custody—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1022.8 Oral Copulation While In Custody—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1022.9 Oral Copulation While In Custody—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1022 Notes
    • F 1022 Note 1 Oral Copulation While In Custody—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1022 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1023–1029 Reserved
  • (iii) Sodomy
  • F 1030 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats (PC 286(c)(2) & (3), (k))
  • F 1030.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1030.1 Inst 1 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Title
    • F 1030.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1030.2 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1030.2 Inst 1 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sodomy In Description Of Elements
  • F 1030.3 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1030.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1030.4 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1030.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1030.4 Inst 2 Consent: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language; Include In Element 3
    • F 1030.4 Inst 3 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
    • F 1030.4 Inst 4 Modification Required Where ID At Issue
  • F 1030.5 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1030.5 Inst 1 Victim Alive As Element
    • F 1030.5 Inst 2 Definition Of Kidnap And False Imprisonment
    • F 1030.5 Inst 3 Alternative 4A: Include Definitions In Elements
    • F 1030.5 Inst 4 Proof Necessary To Establish Element Of Fear (PC 26)
    • F 1030.5 Inst 5 Forcible Sex Offenses: Prior “Dating” Relationship Should Not Be Ignored (PC 261.6)
    • F 1030.5 Inst 6 Forcible Sex Offenses: Definition Of Duress
  • F 1030.6 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Defense Theories
    • F 1030.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
    • F 1030.6 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
  • F 1030.7 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1030.8 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1030.9 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1030 Notes
    • F 1030 Note 1 Sodomy By Force, Fear, Or Threats—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
  • F 1030 Revision History and Commentary
  • F 1031 Sodomy In Concert (PC 286(d))
  • F 1031.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1031.1 Inst 1 Sodomy In Concert—Title
    • F 1031.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1031.2 Sodomy In Concert—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1031.2 Inst 1 Definition Of Consent: Specification Of “The Act”
  • F 1031.3 Sodomy In Concert—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1031.4 Sodomy In Concert—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1031.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1031.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1031.5 Sodomy In Concert—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1031.5 Inst 1 Elements Of Predicate Offense Should Be Included In Elements Of In Concert Instruction
    • F 1031.5 Inst 2 Proof Necessary To Establish Element Of Fear (PC 26)
    • F 1031.5 Inst 3 Forcible Sex Offenses: Acting In Concert—Requirement Of Specific Intent (PC 264.1)
    • F 1031.5 Inst 4 Forcible Sex Offenses: In Concert—Definition Of “In Concert” (PC 264.1)
  • F 1031.6 Sodomy In Concert—Defense Theories
    • F 1031.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1031.7 Sodomy In Concert—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1031.8 Sodomy In Concert—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1031.9 Sodomy In Concert—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1031 Notes
    • F 1031 Note 1 Sodomy In Concert—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1031 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1032 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person (PC 286(i)) [Reserved]
  • F 1032.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1032.1 Inst 1 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—Title
    • F 1032.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1032.2 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1032.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Resisting”—Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1032.2 Inst 2 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sodomy In Description Of Elements
  • F 1032.3 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1032.4 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1032.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
  • F 1032.5 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1032.5 Inst 1 Victim Alive As Element
    • F 1032.5 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1032.5 Inst 3 Include Definition Of Legal Consent In “Prevented From Resisting” Element
    • F 1032.5 Inst 4 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1032.6 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1032.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
    • F 1032.6 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
    • F 1032.6 Inst 3 Rape By Intoxication: “Prevented From Resisting”—Pinpoint Instruction (PC 261(a)(3)
  • F 1032.7 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1032.8 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1032.9 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1032 Notes
    • F 1032 Note 1 Sodomy Of An Intoxicated Person—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
  • F 1033 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person (PC 286(f))
  • F 1033.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1033.1 Inst 1 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—Title
    • F 1033.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1033.2 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1033.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Unconscious Of The Nature Of The Act”—Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1033.2 Inst 2 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sodomy In Description Of Elements
  • F 1033.3 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1033.4 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1033.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1033.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
    • F 1033.4 Inst 3 Improper To Direct Verdict On Element
  • F 1033.5 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1033.5 Inst 1 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1033.5 Inst 2 Include Definition Of “Unconscious” In Description Of Elements
    • F 1033.5 Inst 3 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1033.6 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1033.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1033.7 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1033.8 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1033.9 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1033 Notes
    • F 1033 Note 1 Sodomy Of An Unconscious Person—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
  • F 1034 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person (PC 286(g))
  • F 1034.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1034.1 Inst 1 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—Title
    • F 1034.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1034.2 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1034.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Legally Consenting”; Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1034.2 Inst 2 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sodomy In Description Of Elements
  • F 1034.3 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1034.4 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1034.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1034.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1034.5 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1034.5 Inst 1 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1034.5 Inst 2 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1034.6 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1034.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1034.7 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1034.8 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1034.9 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1034 Notes
    • F 1034 Note 1 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
  • F 1035 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital (PC 286(h))
  • F 1035.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1035.1 Inst 1 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Title
    • F 1035.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1035.2 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1035.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Legally Consenting”; Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1035.2 Inst 2 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sodomy In Description Of Elements
  • F 1035.3 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1035.4 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1035.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1035.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1035.5 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1035.5 Inst 1 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1035.5 Inst 2 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1035.6 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Defense Theories
    • F 1035.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1035.7 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1035.8 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1035.9 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1035 Notes
    • F 1035 Note 1 Sodomy Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
  • F 1036 Sodomy By Fraud (PC 286(j))
  • F 1036.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1036.1 Inst 1 Sodomy By Fraud—Title
    • F 1036.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1036.2 Sodomy By Fraud—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1036.2 Inst 1 Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sodomy In Description Of Elements
  • F 1036.3 Sodomy By Fraud—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1036.4 Sodomy By Fraud—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1036.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1036.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1036.5 Sodomy By Fraud—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]
  • F 1036.6 Sodomy By Fraud—Defense Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1036.7 Sodomy By Fraud—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1036.8 Sodomy By Fraud—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1036.9 Sodomy By Fraud—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1036 Notes
    • F 1036 Note 1 Sodomy By Fraud—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
  • F 1037 Sodomy While In Custody (PC 286(e))
  • F 1037.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1037.1 Inst 1 Sodomy While In Custody —Title
    • F 1037.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1037.2 Sodomy While In Custody—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1037.3 Sodomy While In Custody—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1037.4 Sodomy While In Custody—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1037.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1037.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1037.5 Sodomy While In Custody—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1037.5 Inst 1 Unlawful Sodomy: Prisoner—Defendant And Victim Must Be Inmates (PC 286(e))
  • F 1037.6 Sodomy While In Custody—Defense Theories
    • F 1037.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1037.7 Sodomy While In Custody—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1037.8 Sodomy While In Custody—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1037.9 Sodomy While In Custody—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1037 Notes
    • F 1037 Note 1 Sodomy While In Custody— CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
  • F 1038–1044 Reserved
  • (iv) Sexual Penetration
  • F 1045 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats (PC 289(a)(1) & (2), (g)) (Case Law Discussing This Instruction)
  • F 1045.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1045.1 Inst 1 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Title
    • F 1045.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1045.2 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1045.2 Inst 1 Tailor Element 1 To Facts And Prosecution Theory Of Penetration
  • F 1045.3 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1045.3 Inst 1 Purpose Of Self-Penetration As Enumerated Element
  • F 1045.4 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1045.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1045.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
    • F 1045.4 Inst 3 Modification Required Where ID At Issue
  • F 1045.5 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1045.5 Inst 1 Victim Alive As Element
    • F 1045.5 Inst 2 Definition Of Kidnap And False Imprisonment
    • F 1045.5 Inst 3 Alternative 4A: Include Definitions In Elements
    • F 1045.5 Inst 4 Proof Necessary To Establish Element Of Fear (PC 26)
    • F 1045.5 Inst 5 Forcible Sex Offenses: Definition Of Duress
  • F 1045.6 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Defense Theories
    • F 1045.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
    • F 1045.6 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: Prior “Dating” Relationship Should Not Be Ignored (PC 261.6)
    • F 1045.6 Inst 3 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
  • F 1045.7 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1045.8 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1045.9 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1045 Notes
    • F 1045 Note 1 Sexual Penetration By Force, Fear, Or Threats—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1045 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
    • F 1045 Note 3 Penetration With Foreign Object: Double Jeopardy If Preparatory To Intercourse
    • F 1045 Note 4 Penetration By Foreign Object: Definition Of Penetration
  • F 1046 Sexual Penetration In Concert (PC 264.1, 289(a)(1))
  • F 1046.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1046.1 Inst 1 Sexual Penetration In Concert—Title
    • F 1046.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1046.2 Sexual Penetration In Concert—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1046.3 Sexual Penetration In Concert—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1046.4 Sexual Penetration In Concert—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1046.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1046.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1046.5 Sexual Penetration In Concert—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1046.5 Inst 1 Elements Of Predicate Offense Should Be Included In Elements Of In Concert Instruction
    • F 1046.5 Inst 2 Definition Of Consent: Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1046.5 Inst 3 Proof Necessary To Establish Element Of Fear (PC 26)
    • F 1046.5 Inst 4 Forcible Sex Offenses: Acting In Concert—Requirement Of Specific Intent (PC 264.1)
    • F 1046.5 Inst 5 Forcible Sex Offenses: In Concert—Definition Of “In Concert”(PC 264.1)
  • F 1046.6 Sexual Penetration In Concert—Defense Theories
    • F 1046.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1046.7 Sexual Penetration In Concert—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1046.8 Sexual Penetration In Concert—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1046.9 Sexual Penetration In Concert—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1046 Notes
    • F 1046 Note 1 Sexual Penetration In Concert—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1046 Note 2 Reference To Related FORECITE Issues
  • F 1047 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person (PC 289(e))
  • F 1047.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1047.1 Inst 1 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Title
    • F 1047.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1047.2 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1047.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Resisting”—Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1047.2 Inst 2 Tailor Element 1 To Facts And Prosecution Theory Of Penetration
  • F 1047.3 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1047.4 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1047.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1047.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1047.5 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1047.5 Inst 1 Victim Alive As Element
    • F 1047.5 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1047.5 Inst 3 Include Definition Of Legal Consent In “Prevented From Resisting” Element
    • F 1047.5 Inst 4 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1047.6 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1047.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
    • F 1047.6 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
    • F 1047.6 Inst 3 Sex Offense By Intoxication: “Prevented From Resisting”—Pinpoint Instruction (PC 261(a)(3)
  • F 1047.7 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1047.8 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1047.9 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1047 Notes
    • F 1047 Note 1 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person— CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
    • F 1047 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
    • F 1047 Note 3 Unlawful Penetration By Foreign Object: Lack Of Consent, Intoxicants, Unconsciousness, Etc.—Jury Must Find Fraud “In Fact” (PC 289(d), (e))
  • F 1048 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person (PC 289(d))
  • F 1048.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1048.1 Inst 1 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person—Title
    • F 1048.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1048.2 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1048.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Unconscious Of The Nature Of The Act”—Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1048.2 Inst 2 Tailor Element 1 To Facts And Prosecution Theory Of Penetration
  • F 1048.3 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1048.4 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1048.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1048.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1048.5 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1048.5 Inst 1 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1048.5 Inst 2 Include Definition Of “Unconscious” In Description Of Elements
    • F 1048.5 Inst 3 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1048.6 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1048.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1048.7 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1048.8 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1048.9 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1048 Notes
    • F 1048 Note 1 Sexual Penetration Of An Unconscious Person— CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
    • F 1048 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1049 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person (PC 289(b))
  • F 1049.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1049.1 Inst 1 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—Title
    • F 1049.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1049.2 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1049.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Legally Consenting”; Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1049.2 Inst 2 Tailor Element 1 To Facts And Prosecution Theory Of Penetration
  • F 1049.3 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1049.4 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1049.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1049.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1049.5 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1049.5 Inst 1 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1049.5 Inst 2 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1049.6 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1049.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1049.7 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1049.8 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1049.9 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1049 Notes
    • F 1049 Note 1 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1049 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1050 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital (PC 289(c))
  • F 1050.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1050.1 Inst 1 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital —Title
    • F 1050.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1050.2 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1050.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Legally Consenting”; Specification Of “The Act”
    • F 1050.2 Inst 2 Tailor Element 1 To Facts And Prosecution Theory Of Penetration
  • F 1050.3 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1050.4 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1050.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1050.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1050.5 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1050.5 Inst 1 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
    • F 1050.5 Inst 2 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
  • F 1050.6 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Defense Theories
    • F 1050.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1050.7 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1050.8 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1050.9 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1050 Notes
    • F 1050 Note 1 Sexual Penetration Of A Disabled Person In A Mental Hospital—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1050 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1051 Sexual Penetration By Fraud (PC 289(f))
  • F 1051.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1051.1 Inst 1 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—Title
    • F 1051.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1051.2 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1051.2 Inst 1 Tailor Element 1 To Facts And Prosecution Theory Of Penetration
  • F 1051.3 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
  • F 1051.4 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1051.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1051.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1051.5 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]
  • F 1051.6 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—Defense Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1051.7 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1051.8 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1051.9 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1051 Notes
    • F 1051 Note 1 Sexual Penetration By Fraud—CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
    • F 1051 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1052–1059 Reserved
  • (v) Lewd and Lascivious Act
  • F 1060 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person (PC 288(b)(2) & (c)(2))
  • F 1060.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1060.1 Inst 1 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person—Title
    • F 1060.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1060.2 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1060.3 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1060.3 Inst 1 Willfully: Argumentative
    • F 1060.3 Inst 2 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1060.4 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1060.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1060.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1060.5 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person—Elements And Definitions
    • F 1060.5 Inst 1 Separate Enumeration Of Combined Elements ; Tailoring To Facts; Include Definitions In Elements
    • F 1060.5 Inst 2 Element 4: Include Definitions In Elements
    • F 1060.5 Inst 3 Willfully: Knowledge
  • F 1060.6 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person—Defense Theories
    • F 1060.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
  • F 1060.7 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1060.8 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1060.9 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1060 Notes
    • F 1060 Note 1 Lewd or Lascivious Act: Dependent Person— CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1060 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1061–1069 Reserved
  • B. AGAINST MINORS ONLY
  • (i) Unlawful Sexual Intercourse
  • F 1070 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older (PC 261.5(a) & (d))
  • F 1070.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1070.1 Inst 1 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—Title
    • F 1070.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1070.2 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1070.2 Inst 1 Element 1: Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sexual Intercourse In Description Of Element
    • F 1070.2 Inst 2 Element 2: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1070.2 Inst 3 Element 3: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1070.2 Inst 4 Tailoring To Facts (Elements 2, 3 & 4)
  • F 1070.3 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1070.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1070.4 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1070.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1070.4 Inst 2 Actual And Reasonable Belief That Victim Was 18 Or Over—Modification Of Burden Shifting Language
    • F 1070.4 Inst 3 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1070.5 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]
  • F 1070.6 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—Defense Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1070.7 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1070.8 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1070.9 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1070 Notes
    • F 1070 Note 1 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Defendant 21 Or Older—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1070 Note 2 Statutory Rape: Mistaken Belief As To Age (PC 261.5)
    • F 1070 Note 3 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1071 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger (PC 261.5(a) & (c))
  • F 1071.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1071.1 Inst 1 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—Title
    • F 1071.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1071.2 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1071.2 Inst 1 Element 1: Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sexual Intercourse In Description Of Element
    • F 1071.2 Inst 2 Element 2: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1071.2 Inst 3 Element 3: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1071.2 Inst 4 Tailoring To Facts (Elements 2, 3 & 4)
  • F 1071.3 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1071.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
    • F 1071.3 Inst 2 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1071.4 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1071.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1071.4 Inst 2 Actual And Reasonable Belief That Victim Was 18 Or Over—Modification Of Burden Shifting Language
    • F 1071.4 Inst 3 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1071.5 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]
  • F 1071.6 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—Defense Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1071.7 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1071.8 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1071.9 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1071 Notes
    • F 1071 Note 1 Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor More Than Three Years Younger—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1071 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1072 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age (PC 261.5(a) & (b))
  • F 1072.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1072.1 Inst 1 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—Title
    • F 1072.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1072.2 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1072.2 Inst 1 Element 1: Tailoring To Facts; Include Definition Of Sexual Intercourse In Description Of Element
    • F 1072.2 Inst 2 Element 2: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1072.2 Inst 3 Element 3: Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1072.2 Inst 4 Tailoring To Facts (Elements 2, 3 & 4)
  • F 1072.3 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1072.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
    • F 1072.3 Inst 2 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
  • F 1072.4 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—Burden Of Proof Issues
    • F 1072.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1072.4 Inst 2 Actual And Reasonable Belief That Victim Was 18 Or Over—Modification Of Burden Shifting Language
    • F 1072.4 Inst 3 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
  • F 1072.5 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]
  • F 1072.6 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—Defense Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1072.7 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1072.8 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
  • F 1072.9 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
  • F 1072 Notes
    • F 1072 Note 1 Misdemeanor Unlawful Sexual Intercourse: Minor Within Three Years Of Defendant’s Age—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1072 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
  • F 1073–1079 Reserved
  • (ii) Oral Copulation
  • F 1080 Oral Copulation With Person Under 14 (PC 288a(c)(1))
  • F 1081 Oral Copulation With Minor: Defendant 21 Or Older (PC 288a(b)(2))
  • F 1082 Oral Copulation With Person Under 18 (PC 288a(b)(1))
  • F 1083–1089 Reserved
  • (iii) Sodomy
  • F 1090 Sodomy With Person Under 14 (PC 286(c)(1))
  • F 1091 Sodomy With Minor: Defendant 21 Or Older (PC 286(b)(2))
  • F 1092 Sodomy With Person Under 18 (PC 286(b)(1))
  • F 1093–1099 Reserved
  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES