Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

SERIES 3400 DEFENSES AND INSANITY

F 3400 Alibi

TABLE OF CONTENTS
F 3400.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
F 3400.1 Inst 1 Alibi—Title
F 3400.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
F 3400.1 Inst 3 Delete The Term “Alibi” From Title Of Instruction

F 3400.2 Alibi—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
Modification When Existence Of Crime Is At Issue
F 3400.2 Inst 2 (a & b) Clarification Of Prosecution Burden

F 3400.2 Inst 3 Jurors Must Unanimously Reject Any Defenses Before Convicting

F 3400 NOTES
F 3400 Note 1 Alibi: Instruction As Sanction For Defendant’s Discovery Violation

Return to Series 3400 Table of Contents.


F 3400.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties

F 3400.1 Inst 1 Alibi—Title

See generally FORECITE F 200.1.2 Note 2, CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-002, CCM-003, and CCM-004.


F 3400.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant

See generally FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-005 and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-006.


F 3400.1 Inst 3 Delete The Term “Alibi” From Title Of Instruction

*Modify CC 3400 Title as follows:

Alibi Defense Theory Of Absence From Crime Scene

Points and Authorities

This Court Has The Power And Duty To Grant This Instruction Request—[See CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-001.]

The Term “Alibi” As A Prejudicial Comment On The Evidence—See FORECITE F 416.3 Inst 4; see also United States v. Simon (3rd Cir. 1993) 995 F2d 1236, 1243 n 11; United States v. Robinson (6th Cir. 1979) 602 F2d 760, 762.

WARNING! Federal constitutional claims may be lost without proper federalization.—To preserve federal claims, counsel should add the applicable constitutional provisions and authority to the above points and authorities and explain how those provisions will be violated under the circumstances of this case. Potential constitutional grounds for this request include, but are not limited to:

FORECITE CG 5.4.1 [Instructions That Suggest An Opinion as To An Essential Fact, An Element Or Guilt]
FORECITE
CG 5.4.2 [Argumentative Instructions Not Suggesting Opinion On Guilt]

In death penalty cases, additional federal claims should be added including, but not limited to, those in FORECITE CG 13.


F 3400.2Alibi—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories

F 3400.2 Inst 1 Modification When Existence Of Crime Is At Issue

*Modify CC 3400, paragraph 1, 2 and 3, as follows [added language is underlined]:

The defendant contends (he/she) did not commit (this/these) alleged crime(s) and that (he/she) was somewhere else when the alleged crime[s] (was/were) committed. The People must prove that the defendant was present and committed the alleged crime[s] with which (he/she) is charged. The defendant does not need to prove (he/she) was elsewhere at the time of the alleged crime.

If you have a reasonable doubt about whether the defendant was present when the alleged crime was committed, you must find (him/her) not guilty.

[However, the defendant may also be guilty of __________ <insert crime[s] charged> if (he/she) (aided and abetted/ [or] conspired with) someone else to commit (that/those) alleged crime[s]. If you conclude that the defendant (aided and abetted/ [or] conspired to commit) __________ <insert crime[s] charged>, then (he/she) is guilty even if (he/she) was not present when the alleged crime[s] (was/were) committed.]

Points and Authorities

See FORECITE F 103.2 Inst 2.


F 3400.2 Inst 2 (a & b) Clarification Of Prosecution Burden

*Modify CC 3400 paragraph 1, sentence 4, as follows [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:

The defendant does not need to prove (he/she) was elsewhere at the time of the [alleged] crime or that (he/she) did not commit the crimes with which (he/she) is charged.

*Modify paragraph 3, sentence 2, as follows:

Alternative a:

If you conclude find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant (aided and abetted/ [or] conspired to commit) __________ <insert crime[s] charged>, then (he/she) is guilty even if (he/she) was not present when the crime[s] (was/were) committed.]

Alternative b:

If you conclude the prosecution has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant (aided and abetted/ [or] conspired to commit) ________ <insert crime[s] charged>, then (he/she) is guilty even if (he/she) was not present when the crime[s] (was/were) committed.]

Points and Authorities

This Court Has The Power And Duty To Grant This Instruction Request—[See CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-001.]

The CALCRIM Deficiency—CALCRIM 3400 fails to clearly explain the prosecution’s duty to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. (See FORECITE F 100.1 Inst 1; F 404.2 Inst 1.)

Defendant Has No Obligation To Prove Anything—See FORECITE F 100.1 Inst 1.

Prosecution Must Prove Guilt Beyond A Reasonable Doubt—See FORECITE F 404.2 Inst 1; F 103.2 Inst 1.

No Reference To “The People”—The defendant objects to use of the term “the People” in this instruction and throughout this trial. [See FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1; CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-006.]

Use Of The Term “Defendant”—The defense requests that the defendant be referred to by name throughout this trial and in the jury instructions. [See CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-005.] By using the term “defendant” in this instructional request, the defense does not withdraw the request.

WARNING! Federal constitutional claims may be lost without proper federalization.—To preserve federal claims, counsel should add the applicable constitutional provisions and authority to the above points and authorities and explain how those provisions will be violated under the circumstances of this case. Potential constitutional grounds for this request include, but are not limited to:

FORECITE CG 2.2 [Burden Of Proof: Elements And Essential Facts]
FORECITE
CG 4.1 [Right To Instruct The Jurors On Defense Theories]

In death penalty cases, additional federal claims should be added including, but not limited to, those in FORECITE CG 13.


F 3400.2 Inst 3 Jurors Must Unanimously Reject Any Defenses Before Convicting

See FORECITE F 3500.2 Inst 4.



F 3400 NOTES

F 3400 Note 1 Alibi: Instruction As Sanction For Defendant’s Discovery Violation

See FORECITE F 306 Note 1 and Note 2.

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES