SERIES 1000 SEX OFFENSES
F 1047 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person (PC 289(e))
TABLE OF CONTENTS
F 1047.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
F 1047.1 Inst 1 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Title
F 1047.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
F 1047.2 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
F 1047.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Resisting”—Specification Of “The Act”
F 1047.2 Inst 2 Tailor Element 1 To Facts And Prosecution Theory Of Penetration
F 1047.3 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
F 1047.4 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
F 1047.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
F 1047.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
F 1047.5 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Elements And Definitions
F 1047.5 Inst 1 Victim Alive As Element
F 1047.5 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
F 1047.5 Inst 3 Include Definition Of Legal Consent In “Prevented From Resisting” Element
F 1047.5 Inst 4 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
F 1047.6 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Defense Theories
F 1047.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
F 1047.6 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
F 1047.6 Inst 3 Sex Offense By Intoxication: “Prevented From Resisting”—Pinpoint Instruction (PC 261(a)(3)
F 1047.7 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
F 1047.8 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
F 1047.9 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
F 1047 Notes
F 1047 Note 1 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person— CALCRIM Cross References And Research Notes
F 1047 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
F 1047 Note 3 Unlawful Penetration By Foreign Object: Lack Of Consent, Intoxicants, Unconsciousness, Etc.—Jury Must Find Fraud “In Fact” (PC 289(d), (e))
Return to Series 1000 Table of Contents.
F 1047.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
F 1047.1 Inst 1 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Title
See generally FORECITE F 200.1.2 Note 2, CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-002, CCM-003, and CCM-004.
F 1047.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
See generally FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-005 and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-006.
F 1047.2 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
F 1047.2 Inst 1 Definition Of “Prevented From Resisting”—Specification Of “The Act”
See FORECITE F 1002.2 Inst 4.
F 1047.2 Inst 2 Tailor Element 1 To Facts And Prosecution Theory Of Penetration
See FORECITE F 1045.2 Inst 1.
F 1047.3 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
F 1047.4 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Burden Of Proof Issues
F 1047.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
See FORECITE F 400.4 Inst 1.
F 1047.4 Inst 2 Victim’s Lack Of Clothing Insufficient To Establish Specific Sexual Intent
See FORECITE F 1000.4 Inst 5.
F 1047.5 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Elements And Definitions
F 1047.5 Inst 1 Victim Alive As Element
See FORECITE F 1000.5 Inst 5.
F 1047.5 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: “Should Have Known” Requires Consideration Of Reasonable Person In Defendant’s Situation
See FORECITE F 1002.5 Inst 2.
F 1047.5 Inst 3 Include Definition Of Legal Consent In “Prevented From Resisting” Element
See FORECITE F 1002.5 Inst 3.
F 1047.5 Inst 4 Sex Offense Based On Constructive Knowledge
See FORECITE F 1002.5 Inst 4.
F 1047.6 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Defense Theories
F 1047.6 Inst 1 Sex Offense: Good Faith Belief That Victim Was Dead
See FORECITE F 1000.6 Inst 3.
F 1047.6 Inst 2 Forcible Sex Offenses: Consent Defined—No Need To Instruct On Prior “Dating” Relationship
See FORECITE F 1000.6 Inst 4.
F 1047.6 Inst 3 Sex Offense By Intoxication: “Prevented From Resisting”—Pinpoint Instruction (PC 261(a)(3)
See FORECITE F 1002.6 Inst 3.
F 1047.7 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
F 1047.8 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
F 1047.9 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person—Lesser Offense Issues[Reserved]
F 1047 NOTES
F 1047 Note 1 Sexual Penetration Of An Intoxicated Person— CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
CALCRIM Cross-References:
See FORECITE F 1000 Notes
See FORECITE F 1045 Notes
CALCRIM 1002 [Rape of Intoxicated Woman or Spouse]
CALCRIM 1045 [Sexual Penetration by Force, Fear, or Threats]
CALCRIM 1046 [Sexual Penetration in Concert]
CALCRIM 1048 [Sexual Penetration of an Unconscious Person]
CALCRIM 1049 [Sexual Penetration of a Disabled Person]
CALCRIM 1050 [Sexual Penetration of a Disabled Person in a Mental Hospital]
CALCRIM 1051 [Sexual Penetration by Fraud]
Research Notes:
See CLARAWEB Forum: CALCRIM Warnings, Sex Offenses—Series 1000.
F 1047 Note 2 Sex Crimes: Entrapment
See FORECITE F 1000 Note 5.
F 1047 Note 3 Unlawful Penetration By Foreign Object: Lack Of Consent, Intoxicants, Unconsciousness, Etc.—Jury Must Find Fraud “In Fact” (PC 289(d), (e))
In order to commit a violation of PC 289(d), there must be a fraud “in fact.” It is an essential element of the offense which must be found beyond a reasonable doubt and cannot be a legal question solely for the court. [See Brief Bank # 859. for briefing on this issue.]
CALJIC NOTE: See FORECITE F 10.33 n3.