Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to Practice Guide Table of Contents

PG IX(A)  Supplemental Jury Instructions: Right to Counsel.

 

[RESEARCH NOTE:  See FORECITE BIBLIO 17.40]

 

Reinstruction of the jury after deliberations have begun is a “critical stage of the proceedings” at which the defendant is entitled to the right to counsel and it is error to reinstruct the jury without giving notice to the defendant’s attorney.  (People v. Rubalcava (88) 200 CA3d 295, 299-300 [246 CR 75]; People v. Dagnino (78) 80 CA3d 981, 986-88 [146 CR 129].)

“Any private communication between judge and jury is improper.  [Citations.]”  (People v. Thompson (90) 50 C3d 134, 173 [266 CR 309]; see also Gonzalez v. Commission on Judicial Performance (83) 33 C3d 359 at 375 [188 CR 880].)  “It is well settled that the trial court should not entertain communications … with individual jurors except in open court, with prior notification to counsel.  [Citation.]  This rule is based on the precept that a defendant should be afforded an adequate opportunity to evaluate the propriety of a proposed judicial response in order to pose an objection or suggest a different reply more favorable to the defendant’s case.  [Citations.]”  (People v. Jennings (91) 53 C3d 334, 385 [279 CR 780]; People v. Wright (90) 52 C3d 367, 402 [276 CR 731]; Edlin v. State (Miss. 1988) 523 So.2d 42; People v. Dagnino (78) 80 CA3d 981 [146 CR 129]; People v. Lozano (87) 192 CA3d 618 [237 CR 612].)

 

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES