Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to CALJIC Part 3-4 – Contents

F 4.51 n1  Aider And Abettor Alibi:  CJ 3.01 Also Required.

When CJ 4.51 is given, the jury must also be instructed upon the principles of CJ 3.01.  (People v. Sarkis (90) 222 CA3d 23, 26-28 [272 CR 34].)

[Research Note:  See FORECITE BIBLIO 4.51.]


F 4.51 n2  Failure To Give Alibi Instruction Is Reversible Error.

The failure to give an alibi instruction when there is evidence to support an alibi defense deprives the defendant of instruction on theory of his case and is per se reversible error.  (U.S. v. Zuniga (9th Cir. 1993) 6 F3d 569; see also, U.S. v. Hairston (9th Cir. 1995) 64 F3d 491; United States v. Lillard (9th Cir. 2003) 354 F3d 850.)  However, the applicability of this rule to habeas proceedings was questioned in Duckett v. Godinez (9th Cir. 1995) 67 F3d 734.)

[Research Note:  See FORECITE BIBLIO 4.51.]


F 4.51 n3  Alibi:  Prosecution’s Introduction Of False Alibi Evidence Necessitates Alibi Instruction.

The prosecution’s introduction of evidence concerning the defendant’s alibi triggers the need for an instruction on the defense of alibi even when the prosecution presented the evidence just to make light of it.  (See U.S. v. Hairston (9th Cir. 1995) 64 F3d 491.)


F 4.51 n4  Failure To Request Alibi Instruction As Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel.

In Commonwealth v. Mikell (PA 1999) 729 A2d 566 [556 Pa. 509], trial counsel was held to be ineffective in failing to request an alibi instruction when the defense to a capital charge was alibi.  The defendant was entitled to an instruction explaining that “an alibi defense, either standing alone or together with other evidence, may be sufficient to leave in the minds of the jury a reasonable doubt that might not otherwise exist.”  (729 A2d at 570.)  The court also pointed out that “one of the purposes of an alibi instruction is to ensure that a jury does not interpret the failure to prove the defense as evidence of a defendant’s guilt.”  (Id. at 571.)


F 4.51 n5  Alibi: Improper For Prosecutor To Convince Alibi Witness Not To Testify By Informing The Witness That Perjury Charges Could Be Filed.

(U.S. v. Vavages (9th Cir. 1998) 151 F3d 1185.)


F 4.51 n6  Alibi: Aider And Abettor Or Conspirator: Prejudicial To Include Conspiracy When Not Presented By The Evidence.

See Brief Bank # B-692 for briefing on this issue.

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES