Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to CALJIC Part 14-17 – Contents

F 17.42 n1 Voir Dire/Jury Not To Consider Penalty: Whether Jury Should Be Informed That Non-Capital Special Circumstance Case Does Not Involve The Death Penalty.

(See FORECITE F 0.25 n9.)


F 17.42a

Jury Not To Consider Penalty: Modification When Witness Testifies

Pursuant To Bargain With Prosecution

*To be added at end of CJ 17.42 when appropriate:

However, you are not precluded from considering the potential penalty facing any prosecution witness who had [charges pending] [was on probation] at the time of their testimony [or who received [leniency] [immunity]].

Points and Authorities

CJ 17.42 is overly broad in a case where the potential penalty facing a prosecution witness may bear on that witness’ credibility. Accordingly, CJ 17.42 should be supplemented, upon request and when appropriate, to assure that the jury will fully consider the charges pending against the witness when evaluating the witness’ credibility. The right to such an instruction on request was recognized in People v. Pitts (1990) 223 CA3d 606, 880-81 [judge refused defense request, inter alia, to allow jury to consider punishment “with regard to any witness who had charges pending or who was on probation”]; compare People v. James (2003) 30 CA4th 1084, 1114 [modification not requested]. [See also FORECITE F 2.20a and FORECITE F 3.20a regarding specific instruction upon immunized witnesses and jailhouse informants, and FORECITE F 8.83.2a.)

[Research Note: See FORECITE BIBLIO 17.42.]

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES