Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to CALJIC Part 1-2 – Contents

F 2.83a

Expert Witness:  Weighing One Expert Against Another

 

*Add to CJ 2.83 when appropriate:

In resolving any conflict that may exist in the testimony of expert witnesses, you should weigh the opinion of one expert against that of another.  In doing this, you should consider the relative qualifications and credibility of the expert witnesses, as well as the reasons for each opinion and the facts and other matters upon which it was based. 

Points and Authorities

“It rest[s] with the jury to determine the credibility of the expert witnesses and resolve conflicts in their opinions.  [Citations.]”  (Monterey v. W.W. Leasing (80) 109 CA3d 636, 646 [167 CR 12].)  Hence, when appropriate, CJ 2.80 should be supplemented as set forth above.

Improper or inadequate instruction upon witness credibility implicates the defendant’s state (Art. I § 15 and § 16) and federal (6th and 14th Amendments) constitutional rights to trial by jury and due process.  [See generally, FORECITE PG VII.]

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES