Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

SERIES 3200 ENHANCEMENTS AND SENTENCING FACTORS

F 3261 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule

TABLE OF CONTENTS
F 3261.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
F 3261.1 Inst 1 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Title
F 3261.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant

F 3261.2 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
F 3261.2 Inst 1 Modification Of Burden Shifting Language
F 3261.2 Inst 2 Temporary Safety: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language

F 3261.3 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]

F 3261.4 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Burden Of Proof Issues
F 3261.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements

F 3261.5 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]

Return to Series 3200 Table of Contents.


F 3261.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties

F 3261.1 Inst 1 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Title

See generally FORECITE F 200.1.2 Note 2, CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-002, CCM-003, and CCM-004.


F 3261.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant

See generally FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-005 and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-006.


F 3261.2During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories

F 3261.2 Inst 1 Modification Of Burden Shifting Language

ALERT: [NF] People v. Wilkins (3/7/2013, S190713) 56 CA4th 333 held that the trial court should have instructed the jury, as requested, with CALCRIM 3261, on the theory that a homicide and an underlying felony do not constitute one continuous transaction for purposes of the felony-murder rule if the killer has escaped to a place of temporary safety before the homicide takes place. However, Wilkins did not address the burden shifting issue.

*Modify CC 3261 as follows [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:

<Robbery>

[The crime of robbery [or attempted robbery] continues until the perpetrator[s] (has/have) actually reached a temporary place of safety. The perpetrator[s] (has/have) reached a temporary place of safety if:

The prosecution is required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> did not reach a place of temporary safety. To meet this burden the prosecution must prove one or more of the following:

• (He/She/They) (has/have) 1. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> did not successfully escaped from the scene; [and]

• (He/She/They) (is/are) 2. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> was/were no longer being chased(; [and]/.)

• [(He/She/They) (has/have) 3. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> did not [abandon or have unchallenged possession of the property taken in the robbery (;[and]/.)]

• [(He/She/They) (is/are) 4. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> was/were no longer in continuous physical control of the person ________________ <person alleged to be the target of the robbery> who is was the target of the robbery.]]

Points and Authorities

See FORECITE F 404.2 Inst 1.


F 3261.2 Inst 2 Temporary Safety: Modification Of Burden Shifting Language

ALERT: [NF] People v. Wilkins (3/7/2013, S190713) 56 CA4th 333 held that the trial court should have instructed the jury, as requested, with CALCRIM 3261, on the theory that a homicide and an underlying felony do not constitute one continuous transaction for purposes of the felony-murder rule if the killer has escaped to a place of temporary safety before the homicide takes place. However, Wilkins did not address the burden shifting issue.

*Modify CC 3261, Burglary, after sentence 1 [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:

<Burglary>

[The crime of burglary [or attempted burglary] continues until the perpetrator[s] (has/have) actually reached a temporary place of safety. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that _______________<name of perpetrator(s)> did not actually reach a temporary place of safety. To do so the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the following: The perpetrator[s] (has/have) reached a temporary place of safety if (he/she/they) (has/have) successfully escaped from the scene[,] [and] (is/are) no longer being chased[, and (has/have) unchallenged possession of the property].]

• (He/She/They) (has/have) 1. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> did not successfully escaped from the scene; [and]

• (He/She/They) (is/are) 2. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> was/were no longer being chased(; [and]/.)

• [(He/She/They) (has/have) 3. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> did not [abandon or have unchallenged possession of the property taken in the burglary (;[and]/.)]

• [(He/She/They) (is/are) 4. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> was/were no longer in continuous physical control of the person ________________ <person alleged to be the target of the burglary> who is was the target of the burglary.]]

*Modify CC 3261, Sexual Assault, after sentence 1 [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:

<Sexual Assault>

[The crime of __________ <insert sexual assault alleged> [or attempted

__________ <insert sexual assault alleged>] continues until the perpetrator[s]

(has/have) actually reached a temporary place of safety. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that _______________<name of perpetrator(s)> did not actually reach a temporary place of safety. To do so the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the following:The perpetrator[s] (has/have) reached a temporary place of safety if (he/she/they) (has/have) successfully escaped from the scene[,] [and] (is/are) no longer being chased[,and (is/are) no longer in continuous physical control of the person who was the target of the crime].]

• (He/She/They) (has/have) 1. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> did not successfully escaped from the scene; [and]

• (He/She/They) (is/are) 2. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> was/were no longer being chased(; [and]/.)

• [(He/She/They) (is/are) 4. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> was/were no longer in continuous physical control of the person ________________ <person alleged to be the target of the sexual assault> who is was the target of the sexual assault.]]

*Modify CC 3261, Kidnapping, after sentence 1 [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:

<Kidnapping>

[The crime of kidnapping [or attempted kidnapping] continues until the perpetrator[s] (has/have) actually reached a temporary place of safety. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that _______________<name of perpetrator(s)> did not actually reach a temporary place of safety. To do so the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the following: The perpetrator[s] (has/have) reached a temporary place of safety if (he/she/they) (has/have) successfully escaped from the scene, (is/are) no longer being chased, and (is/are) no longer in continuous physical control of the person kidnapped.]

• (He/She/They) (has/have) 1. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> did not successfully escaped from the scene; [and]

• (He/She/They) (is/are) 2. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> was/were no longer being chased(; [and]/.)

• [(He/She/They) (is/are) 4. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> was/were no longer in continuous physical control of the person ________________ <person alleged to be the target of the kidnapping> who is was the target of the kidnapping.]]

*Modify CC 3261, Other Felony, after sentence 1 [added language is underlined; deleted language is stricken]:

<Other Felony>

[The crime of __________ <insert felony alleged> [or attempted __________

<insert felony alleged>] continues until the perpetrator[s] (has/have) actually reached a temporary place of safety. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that _______________<name of perpetrator(s)> did not actually reach a temporary place of safety. To do so the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt any of the following: The perpetrator[s] (has/have) reached a temporary place of safety if (he/she/they) (has/have) successfully escaped from the scene and (is/are) no longer being chased.]

• (He/She/They) (has/have) 1. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> did not successfully escaped from the scene; [and]

• (He/She/They) (is/are) 2. ____________ <name of perpetrator(s)> was/were no longer being chased(; [and]/.)

Points and Authorities

See FORECITE F 404.2 Inst 1.


F 3261.3 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.[Reserved]


F 3261.4 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Burden Of Proof Issues

F 3261.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements

See FORECITE F 400.4 Inst 1.


F 3261.5 During Commission Of Felony: Defined—Escape Rule—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES