Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

SERIES 1800 THEFT AND EXTORTION

A THEFT

F 1800 Theft By Larceny (PC 484)

    • F 1800.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1800.1 Inst 1 Theft By Larceny—Title
      • F 1800.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1800.2 Theft By Larceny—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1800.2 Inst 1 Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1800.3 Theft By Larceny—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
      • F 1800.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language: Slight Value
      • F 1800.3 Inst 2 Deletion Of Argumentative Language: Time And Distance
      • F 1800.3 Inst 3 “Small Distance” To “Short Distance”
    • F 1800.4 Theft By Larceny—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1800.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1800.5 Theft By Larceny—Elements And Definitions
      • F 1800.5 Inst 1 Separate Enumeration Of Combined Elements; Value As Element”
      • F 1800.5 Inst 2 No Completed Theft When Store Personnel Consent To Taking Merchandise Outside
      • F 1800.5 Inst 3 Theft By Appropriation Of Lost Property (PC 485)
      • F 1800.5 Inst 4 Theft By Larceny: Possession Issues And Instructions
      • F 1800.5 Inst 5 Failure To Define “Consent”
    • F 1800.6 Theft By Larceny—Defense Theories
      • F 1800.6 Inst 1 (a & b) Theft: Good Faith Belief In Consent (PC 484 & PC 487)
      • F 1800.6 Inst 2 Theft: Taking For Purpose Of Obtaining Refund
    • F 1800.7 Theft By Larceny—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1800.8 Theft By Larceny—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1800.9 Theft By Larceny—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1800 Notes
      • F 1800 Note 1 Theft By Larceny—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F 1800 Note 2 Theft: Claim Of Right Defense To Theft (PC 484 & PC 487)
      • F 1800 Note 3 Theft: General Verdict Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Where Jury Not Instructed On Theory Shown By The Evidence (PC 484 & PC 487)
      • F 1800 Note 4 Theft: Distinction Between Larceny And Theft By False Pretenses (PC 484 & PC 487)
      • F 1800 Note 5 Attempted Theft By False Pretenses As LIO Of Theft (PC 484 & PC 487)
      • F 1800 Note 6 Theft: Multiple Theories Shown At Trial (PC 484 & PC 487)
      • F 1800 Note 7 Victim’s Retention of Security Interest In Stolen Goods Does Not Preclude Perpetrator’s Conviction For Theft By False Pretenses
      • F 1800 Note 8 Theft Of Community Property
      • F 1800 Note 9 Theft: Taking Of Impounded Vehicle
      • F 1800 Note 10 Theft: Making An Unauthorized Copy Of A Key
      • F 1800 Note 11 Theft Of Real Property Requires Defendant To Have Made False Representation To The Owner (PC 484(a) & PC 487)
      • F 1800 Note 12 Theft: Abandoned Property
      • F 1800 Note 13 Theft: Distinction Between Theft By False Pretenses And Theft By Trick and Device
      • F 1800 Note 14 Theft By Larceny: Taking For Purpose Of Obtaining Refund Is Completed Theft
      • F 1800 Note 15 Larceny: Defendant’s Poverty Or Financial Condition As Evidence Of Motive
      • F 1800 Note 16 Financial Situation Of Defendant Less Relevant When Crime Primarily Involves Violence
      • F 1800 Note 17 Theft: Propriety Of Multiple Conviction (PC 484 & PC 487)
      • F 1800 Note 18 Various Forms Of Larceny And Embezzlement Are All Crimes Of Theft
    • F 1801 Theft: Degrees (PC 486, PC 487–488, P C 491)
    • F 1801.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1801.1 Inst 1 Theft: Degrees—Title
      • F 1801.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1801.2 Theft: Degrees—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1801.2 Inst 1 Theft: Deletion Of Argumentative Language
      • F 1801.2 Inst 2 (a & b) Theft: Degrees—No Duty To Decide
      • F 1801.2 Inst 3 Theft: Degrees—Dewberry
      • F 1801.2 Inst 4 Grand Theft From The Person: Taking Of Property After Victim Flees [CALCRIM 3400 Adaption]
    • F 1801 Notes
      • F 1801 Note 1 Theft: Degrees—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F 1801 Note 2 Grand Theft From The Person (PC 487(2))
      • F 1801 Note 3 Grand Theft From The Person (PC 487(2)): Taking Property After Victim Flees
    • F 1802 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan
    • F 1802.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1802.1 Inst 1 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan—Title
      • F 1802.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1802.2 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
    • F 1802.3 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
      • F 1802.3 Inst 1 (a & b) Jurors Not Required To Decide
      • F 1802.3 Inst 2 Clarification Of Conflicting Language
    • F 1802.4 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1802.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1802.5 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]
    • F 1802.6 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan—Defense Theories [Reserved]
    • F 1802.7 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1802.8 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1802.9 Theft: As Part Of Overall Plan—Lesser Offense Issues
      • F 1802.9 Inst 1 Specification Of Proof Beyond A Reasonable Doubt
    • F 1803 Theft By Employee Or Agent (PC 487(b)(3))
    • F 1803.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1803.1 Inst 1 Theft By Employee Or Agent—Title
      • F 1803.1 Inst 2Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1803.2 Theft By Employee Or Agent—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1803.2 Inst 1 Tailoring To Facts; Separate Enumeration Of Compound Elements; Incorporation Of Definition In Enumerated Elements
    • F 1803.3 Theft By Employee Or Agent—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
    • F 1803.4 Theft By Employee Or Agent—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1803.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1803.5 Theft By Employee Or Agent—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]
    • F 1803.6 Theft By Employee Or Agent—Defense Theories [Reserved]
    • F 1803.7 Theft By Employee Or Agent—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1803.8 Theft By Employee Or Agent—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1803.9 Theft By Employee Or Agent—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1803 Notes
      • F 1803 Note 1 Theft By Employee Or Agent—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1804 Theft By False Pretense (PC 484) (Case Law Discussing This Instruction)
    • F 1804.1Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1804.1 Inst 1 Theft By False Pretense—Title
      • F 1804.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1804.2 Theft By False Pretense—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1804.2 Inst 1 Separate Enumeration Of Combined Elements; Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1804.3 Theft By False Pretense—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
      • F 1804.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
    • F 1804.4 Theft By False Pretense—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1804.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1804.5 Theft By False Pretense—Elements And Definitions
      • F 1804.5 Inst 1 Theft By False Pretense—Possession Issues And Instructions
      • F 1804.5 Inst 2 Value As Element
    • F 1804.6 Theft By False Pretense—Defense Theories
      • F 1804.6 Inst 1 Slight Value As Factor For Jurors To Consider
    • F 1804.7 Theft By False Pretense—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1804.8 Theft By False Pretense—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1804.9 Theft By False Pretense—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1804 Notes
      • F 1804 Note 1 Theft By False Pretense—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F1804 Note 2 Attempted Theft By False Pretenses As LIO Of Theft (PC 484 & PC 487)
      • F 1804 Note 3 Theft: Distinction Between Theft By False Pretenses And Theft By Trick and Device
      • F 1804 Note 4 Theft: Distinction Between Larceny And Theft By False Pretenses (PC 484 & PC 487)
    • F 1804 Revision History and Commentary
    • F 1805 Theft By Trick (PC 484)
    • F 1805.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1805.1 Inst 1 Theft By Trick—Title
      • F 1805.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1805.2 Theft By Trick—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1805.2 Inst 1 Separate Enumeration Of Combined Elements; Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1805.3 Theft By Trick—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
      • F 1805.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
    • F 1805.4 Theft By Trick—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1805.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1805.5 Theft By Trick—Elements And Definitions
      • F 1805.5 Inst 1 Theft By Trick– Possession Issues And Instructions
    • F 1805.6 Theft By Trick—Defense Theories
      • F 1805.6 Inst 1 Slight Value As Factor For Jurors To Consider
    • F 1805.7 Theft By Trick—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1805.8 Theft By Trick—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1805.9 Theft By Trick—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1805 Notes
      • F 1805 Note 1 Theft By Trick—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F 1805 Note 2 Theft: Distinction Between Theft By False Pretenses And Theft By Trick and Device
    • F 1806 Theft By Embezzlement (PC 484, PC 503–515)
    • F 1806.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1806.1 Inst 1 Theft By Embezzlement—Title
      • F 1806.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1806.2 Theft By Embezzlement—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1806.2 Inst 1 When Agent At Issue: Tailor To Facts
      • F 1806.2 Inst 2 Tailoring To Facts: Specify Owner And Property
    • F 1806.3Theft By Embezzlement—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
    • F 1806.4 Theft By Embezzlement—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1806.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1806.5 Theft By Embezzlement—Elements And Definitions
      • F 1806.5 Inst 1 Embezzlement: “Relation Of Trust And Confidence” Defined (PC 503)
    • F 1806.6 Theft By Embezzlement—Defense Theories
      • F 1806.6 Inst 1 (a-c) Embezzlement: Restoration Of The Funds As Defense Theory (PC 512)
    • F 1806.7 Theft By Embezzlement—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1806.8 Theft By Embezzlement—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1806.9 Theft By Embezzlement—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1806 Notes
      • F 1806 Note 1 Theft By Embezzlement—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F 1806 Note 2Embezzlement: Claim Of Right As Defense
    • F 1807 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult (PC 368(d), (e))
    • F 1807.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1807.1 Inst 1 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—Title
      • F 1807.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1807.2 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1807.2 Inst 1 Separate Enumeration Of Combined Elements; Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1807.3 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
    • F 1807.4 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1807.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1807.5 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—Elements And Definitions
      • F 1807.5 Inst 1 (a & b) Reasonably Should Have Known—Objective Standard
    • F 1807.6 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—Defense Theories [Reserved]
    • F 1807.7 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1807.8 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1807.9 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1807 Notes
      • F 1807 Note 1 Theft From Elder Or Dependent Adult—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F 1807 Note 2 Embezzlement From Elderly Person (PC 368(c))
    • F 1808–1819 Reserved

B. TAKING OR TAMPERING WITH VEHICLE

    • F 1820 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle (VC 10851(a), (b)) (Case Law Discussing This Instruction)
    • F 1820.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1820.1 Inst 1 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—Title
      • F 1820.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1820.2 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1820.2 Inst 1 Separate Enumeration Of Combined Elements; Tailoring To Facts
      • F 1820.2 Inst 2 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
    • F 1820.3 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
      • F 1820.3 Inst 1 Deletion Of Argumentative Language
      • F 1820.3 Inst 2 Jurors Not Required To Decide
    • F 1820.4 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1820.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1820.5 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]
    • F 1820.6 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—Defense Theories
      • F 1820.6 Inst 1 Juror Consideration Of Prior Consent
      • F 1820.6 Inst 2 (a & b) Juror Consideration That Vehicle Was Only Moved A Short Distance
    • F 1820.7 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1820.8 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1820.9 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1820 Notes
      • F 1820 Note 1 Unlawful Taking Or Driving Of Vehicle—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F 1820 Note 2 Auto Taking: Taking And Receiving The Same Vehicle (PC 487 & VC 10851)
      • F 1820 Note 3 Unlawful Vehicle Taking (VC 10851): Auto Tampering (VC 10852) As Lesser Included
      • F 1820 Note 4 Auto Taking: When Acts May Constitute Either Of Two Crimes (PC 487 & VC 10851)
      • F 1820 Note 5 Auto Taking: Accessory After The Fact Liability
      • F 1820 Note 6 Presumption Of Embezzlement Improper In VC 10851 Case
    • F 1821 Tampering With A Vehicle (VC 1085)
    • F 1821.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1821.1 Inst 1 Tampering With A Vehicle —Title
      • F 1821.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1821.2 Tampering With A Vehicle—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1821.2 Inst 1 Separate Enumeration Of Combined Elements; Tailoring To Facts
    • F 1821.3 Tampering With A Vehicle—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
      • F 1821.3 Inst 1 Willfully: Argumentative
    • F 1821.4 Tampering With A Vehicle—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1821.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1821.5 Tampering With A Vehicle—Elements And Definitions
      • F 1821.5 Inst 1 Willfully: Knowledge
      • F 1821.5 Inst 2 “Injure” vs. “Damage
    • F 1821.6 Tampering With A Vehicle—Defense Theories [Reserved]
    • F 1821.7 Tampering With A Vehicle—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1821.8 Tampering With A Vehicle—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1821.9 Tampering With A Vehicle—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1821 Notes
      • F 1821 Note 1 Tampering With A Vehicle—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F 1822 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel (PC 499b)
    • F 1822.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1822.1 Inst 1 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—Title
      • F 1822.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
    • F 1822.2 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
      • F 1822.2 Inst 1 Separate Enumeration Of Combined Elements; Tailoring To Facts; Deletion Of Argumentative Language
    • F 1822.3 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]
    • F 1822.4 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1822.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1822.5 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—Elements And Definitions
      • F 1822.5 Inst 1 Unlawful Vehicle Taking: Joy Rider Need Not Have Taken The Vehicle (PC 499b)
    • F 1822.6 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—Defense Theories [Reserved]
    • F 1822.7 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1822.8 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1822.9 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1822 Notes
      • F 1822 Note 1 Unlawful Taking Of Bicycle Or Vessel—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F 1822 Note 2 Taking And Receiving The Same Bicycle/Vessel (PC 499b)
    • F 1823–1829 Reserved

C. EXTORTION

    • F 1830 Extortion By Threat Or Force (PC 518, PC 519) [No Forecite Entries On This Instruction]
    • F 1831 Extortion By Threatening Letter (PC 523) [No Forecite Entries On This Instruction]
    • F 1832 Extortion Of Signature (PC 522) [No Forecite Entries On This Instruction]
    • F 1833–1849 Reserved

D. PETTY THEFT WITH A PRIOR

    • F 1850 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction (PC 666)
    • F 1850.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
      • F 1850.1 Inst 1 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—Title
      • F 1850.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
      • F 1850.1 Inst 3 Title: Deletion Of Prejudicial Reference To Prior Conviction
    • F 1850.2 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
    • F 1850.3 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
      • F 1850.3 Inst 1 Jurors Not Required To Decide
    • F 1850.4 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—Burden Of Proof Issues
      • F 1850.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements
    • F 1850.5 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—Elements And Definitions
      • F 1850.5 Inst 1 Incorporation Of Prior Into Enumerated Elements
      • F 1850.5 Inst 2 Petty Theft With Prior: Burglary Must Be Theft Related
      • F 1850.5 Inst 3 Prior Conviction And Incarceration Must Be Found By Jurors
    • F 1850.6 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—Defense Theories [Reserved]
    • F 1850.7 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1850.8 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]
    • F 1850.9 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]
    • F 1850 Notes
      • F 1850 Note 1 Petty Theft With Prior Conviction—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
      • F 1850 Note 2 Petty Theft: Bifurcation Of Prior (PC 666)
      • F 1850 Note 3 Petty Theft With Prior: Whether Enhancement Must Be Pleaded In Charging Document
      • F 1850 Note 4 Petty Theft: Stipulation To Prior (PC 666)
    • F 1851–1859 Reserved

E. THEFT RELATED INSTRUCTIONS

  • F 1860Owner’s Opinion Of Value
  • F 1860.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1860.1 Inst 1 Owner’s Opinion Of Value—Title
    • F 1860.1 Inst 2 “Alleged” Owner’s Opinion Of Value.
  • F 1860.2 Owner’s Opinion Of Value—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]
  • F 1860.3 Owner’s Opinion Of Value—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc.
    • F 1860.3 Inst 1 Jury Should Consider Truth And Accuracy Of Testimony
    • F 1860.3 Inst 2 Alleged Owner’s Opinion Of Value: Jurors Need Not Provide A Reason For Rejecting Testimony
  • F 1861 Jury Does Not Need To Agree On Form Of Theft
  • F 1861.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1861.1 Inst 1 Jury Does Not Need To Agree On Form Of Theft—Title
    • F 1861.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1861.2 Jury Does Not Need To Agree On Form Of Theft—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1861.2 Inst 1 Tailoring To Facts: Specify Act Or Acts Relied On By Prosecution
  • F 1862 Return Of Property Not A Defense To Theft (PC 512, PC 513)
  • F 1862.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1862.1 Inst 1 Return Of Property Not A Defense To Theft—Title
    • F 1862.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1862.2 Return Of Property Not A Defense To Theft—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1862.2 Inst 1 Embezzlement: Restoration Of The Funds as Defense (PC 512)
    • F 1862.2 Inst 2 Delete As Improper Comment On The Specific Evidence
    • F 1862.2 Inst 3 (a-d) Juror Consideration Of Fact That Defendant Returned Property
  • F 1863 Defense To Theft Or Robbery: Claim of Right (PC 511) (Case Law Discussing This Instruction)
  • F 1863.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
    • F 1863.1 Inst 1 Defense To Theft Or Robbery: Claim of Right—Title
    • F 1863.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant
  • F 1863.2 Defense To Theft Or Robbery: Claim of Right—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories
    • F 1863.2 Inst 1 (a & b) Claim Of Right: Correction Of Burden Shifting Language
    • F 1863.2 Inst 2 Claim Of Right: Element Of The Charge
    • F 1863.2 Inst 3 Claim Of Right [CALCRIM 3400 Adaption]
    • F 1863.2 Inst 4 Pinpoint Instruction: Abandoned Or Lost Property
    • F 1863.2 Inst 5 Claim Of Right: Improper To Require That The Defendant “Openly Took” The Property And Did Not “Conceal”
    • F 1863.2 Inst 6 Claim Of Right: Where Defendant Didn’t Actually Take The Property
    • F 1863.2 Inst 7 (a & b) Claim Of Right On Behalf Of Another
    • F 1863.2 Inst 8 Good Faith Intent To Return The Property As Defense Theory To Theft, Robbery Or Receiving Stolen Property Prosecution
    • F 1863.2 Inst 9 Claim Of Right—Unreasonable Belief In Right To Property
    • F 1863.2 Inst 10 (a & b) Robbery/Theft: Good Faith Belief In Consent (PC 484 & PC 487)
    • F 1863.2 Inst 11 Improper Instruction On Inference From Knowledge Of Facts Which Make Good Faith Belief Completely Unreasonable
  • F 1863 NOTES
    • F 1863 Note 1 Defense To Theft Or Robbery: Claim of Right—CALCRIM Cross-References And Research Notes
    • F 1863 Note 2 Claim Of Right: Inapplicable To Ransom Demand
    • F 1863 Note 3 Claim Of Right: Improper To Define As A Defense
    • F 1863 Note 4 Robbery: Claim Of Right Limitations (PC 211)
    • F 1863 Note 5 Kidnap For Ransom: Claim Of Right Inapplicable (PC 209)
    • F 1863 Note 6 Kidnapping To Commit Robbery: Claim Of Right Defense (PC 209)
    • F 1863 Note 7 Kidnapping to Commit Robbery: Claim of Right Defense (PC 209)
    • F 1863 Note 8 Claim Of Right: Overlap With Mistake Of Fact
    • F 1863 Note 9 Claim of Right Based On Accomplice’s Ownership Of Property May Negate Intent to Steal
    • F 1863 Note 10 Strategy Note: Claim Of Right
  • F 1864–1899 Reserved
  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES