Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to Return to Non-CALJIC Evidentiary – Contents

F 2.013a

When Ex-Felon Status Is Proven By Specific Evidence

Evidence has been presented on the issue of defendant’s ex-felon status.  Your consideration of this evidence must be limited to the purpose of determining if it proves the ex-felon element of Count ____. 

 

You are not to consider such evidence to prove that defendant is a person of bad character, that [he] [she] has a disposition to commit crime, or for any other purpose.

 

Points and Authorities

When the defendant does not stipulate to his/her ex-felon status specific evidence concerning that issue is relevant and admissible.  (People v. Bennett (87) 188 CA3d 911, 914 [233 CR 729].)  When such evidence is presented, the defense has a right to instruction, upon request, to limit the jury’s consideration of this evidence.  (See People v. Ratcliff (90) 223 CA3d 1401, 1405-07 [273 CR 253].)

Improper jury reliance upon such evidence would lessen the prosecution’s burden and implicate the defendant’s federal (6th and 14th Amendments) constitutional rights to trial by jury and due process.

CAVEAT:  As with most cautionary or limiting instructions, counsel will have to determine whether the benefits of the instruction outweigh the danger that it might unduly emphasize the prejudicial matter.  [See FORECITE F 2.002a.]

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES