Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to Return to Non-CALJIC Evidentiary – Contents

F 2.011a  Jurors To Disregard Defendant’s Courtroom Behavior.

(This instruction has been renumbered FORECITE F 2.60b.)


F 2.011e

Failure Of Prosecution To Have Informant Witness Available.

                *Add to CJ 2.11:

The prosecution failed to have the witness __________ [name or description] available due to the failure of the police agencies to exercise due diligence in ascertaining the identity and address of the witness [maintaining contact with the witness] during the course of their investigation. 

Because of this failure, you must presume that the testimony of the witness, if [he] [she] were available, would be favorable to the defendant.

Points and Authorities

                It is well settled that the confrontation clause of the Federal constitution (6th and 14th amendments) requires the prosecution to exercise good faith and due diligence in obtaining and maintaining contact with confidential informants.  (See Twiggs v. Superior Court (83) 34 C3d 360, 365 [194 CR 152]; Eleazer v. Superior Court (70) 1 C3d 847, 851 [83 CR 586]; cf., Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 US 36 [158 LEd2d 177; 124 SCt 1354] [recognizing importance of 6th Amendment right to confrontation].)

The above instruction is from Deerings EC 413, “Suggested Forms” for use in such a case.  (See also FORECITE F 2.014a.)

RESEARCH NOTES

                See Annotation, Adverse presumption or inference based on state’s failure to produce or examine informant in criminal prosecution ‑‑ modern cases, 80 ALR4th 547 and Later Case Service.

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES