Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

PG VIII(F)  Special Verdict Form: Coercive Impact On Jury. 

Although there is no per se prohibition, “[a]s a rule, special verdicts in criminal trials are not favored.”  (U.S. v. O’Looney (9th Cir. 1976) 544 F2d 385, 392; see also U.S. v. Reed (9th Cir. 1998) 147 F3d 1178.)  The purpose of this rule is to protect the rights of criminal defendants by preventing the court from pressuring the jury to convict.  In O’Looney, the court summarized the concerns with special verdicts as follows: “To ask the jury special questions might be said to infringe on its powers to deliberate free from legal fetters; on its power to arrive at a general verdict without having to support it by reasons or by a report of its deliberations; and on its power to follow or not to follow the instructions of the court.  Moreover, any abridgement or modification of this institution would partly restrict its historic function, that of tempering rules of law by common sense brought to bear upon the facts of a specific case.”  (O’Looney 544 F2d at 392.)

However, exceptions to the general rule disfavoring special verdicts in criminal cases have been expanded and approved in an increasing number of circumstances.  Ultimately these cases make it clear that use of a special verdict form is a matter of the district court’s discretion to be determined on the facts of each case.  (Reed, 147 F3d at 1181.)  Specifically, a special verdict form which requires the jury to determine the existence of any of a series of acts, each of which is sufficient to constitute the indicted crime, does not implicate the traditional concerns regarding special verdicts.  (Ibid.)

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES