Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to Practice Guide Table of Contents

PG I(J) INSTRUCTIONS TO GRAND JURY

PG I(J)(1) The Law Of Grand Juries And Indictments.

A person subject to indictment by a grand jury must be afforded certain protections: the prosecution cannot bring the charge of perjury before the same jury that heard the questioned testimony because they already have a “state of mind in reference to the case”; the alleged perjuror is entitled to notice of the right to bring exculpatory evidence to the attention of the grand jury; and, the prosecutor’s instructions to the jury must focus on the elements of materiality and knowledge of falsity. (See McGill v. Superior Court (2011) 195 CA4th 1454.)


PG I(J)(2) Grand Jury Instructions: Right To Discovery.

People v. Superior Court (Mouchaourab) (2000) 78 CA4th 403, 436-37 held that the defendant has a right to discovery of information regarding certain nontestimonial proceedings before the grand jury, including the instructions the district attorney and supervising court give the grand jurors. The majority inferred the right to discovery of the nontestimonial portions of the grand jury record from state supreme court cases that considered such information in evaluating defendants’ statutory challenges to their indictments. (See also Johnson v. Superior Court (1975) 15 C3d 248 [prosecutor must present to grand jury exculpatory material of which prosecutor is aware]; People v. Backus (1979) 23 C3d 360; Cummiskey v. Superior Court (1992) 3 C4th 1018.)

When a grand jury indictment is challenged pursuant to PC 995 the reviewing court may consider instructional error, along with the evidence and the manner in which the prosecutor conducted the proceedings, to determine whether the grand jury found the indictment on less than reasonable and probable cause. (Cummiskey v. Superior Court (1992) 3 C4th 1018; see also People v. Gnass (2002) 101 CA4th 1271, 1314.) Among the instructional factors to consider is whether the grand jury was instructed on all elements of the alleged offense. (People v. Gnass, supra.)


PG I(J)(3) Grand Jury: Transcript Of Prosecutor’s Remarks To Grand Jurors.

A reviewing court may consider instructional error, along with the evidence and the manner in which the prosecutor conducted the proceedings, to determine whether the grand jury found the indictment on less than reasonable and probable cause. (Cummiskey v. Superior Court (1992) 3 C4th 1018; see also People v. Gnass (2002) 101 CA4th 1271, 1316.)

Accordingly, it may be argued that the failure to transcribe the prosecutor’s opening and closing remarks to the grand jury violates the accused’s constitutional rights to due process and equal protection. (See Gnass, 101 CA4th at 1316 [recognizing but not resolving this issue].)

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES