Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to Practice Guide Table of Contents

PG II(J)  Determining An Instruction’s “Readability” Score. 

The Federal Juridical Center suggests calculating a “readability” score for testing the ease of comprehension of instructions.  This readability score is based on an index designed by Dr. Rudolph Flesch.  (Flesch, Measuring the Level of Abstraction, 34 J. Applied Psychology 384 (1950).)  This test combines into a single score two measures that are associated with ease of comprehension:  (1) the average number of syllables per word and (2) the proportion of words that are concrete as contrasted with abstract.  The test does not require much subjective judgment by the person doing the scoring and may, therefore, be said to be relatively objective.  However, because any such test provides only an indirect and imperfect measure of comprehensive ability, the Federal Judicial Center added the following caveat: 

“We would generally expect improvement in comprehensibility to be accompanied by improvement in Flesch scores, but it should not be assumed that instructions with higher Flesch scores are invariably more understandable than instructions with lower scores.”  (Federal Judicial Center, p. 172.) 

For purposes of the test, words are identified as uncommon based on Thorndike and Lorge (discussed in the preceding section).  Thorndike and Lorge have determined that the if word is used less frequently than 10 times per million words of writing, then it is considered to be uncommon.  (NOTE:  The count of uncommon words is unduplicated:  a word is counted only once even if it used more than once in a particular instruction.)

[See also FORECITE BIBLIO, “Language/Drafting of Instructions” (BIBLIO L)]

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES