Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to Practice Guide Table of Contents

PG II(C) Language From Appellate Court Opinions.

Language taken verbatim from an appellate court decision is deemed to be a correct statement of the law. (People v. Jones (1971) 19 CA3d 437, 447.) However, such language is not appropriate for a jury instruction if it states a standard of appellate review (People v. Lucero (1988) 44 C3d 1006, 1021), if it serves as a judicial comment “aimed at specific evidence,” (People v. Harris (1989) 47 C3d 1047, 1098, fn 31), or if it merely restates issues which are fully covered by other instructions (People v. Adams (1987) 196 CA3d 201, 204). Thus, there is a danger inherent in simply incorporating language taken from an appellate opinion into a jury instruction. (People v. Wagner (2009) 170 CA4th 499, 508; see also Delos v. Farmers Ins. (1979) 93 CA3d 642, 656 [judicial opinions are not written as jury instructions and may be notoriously unreliable as such].)

[See also FORECITE BIBLIO, “Language/Drafting of Instructions” (BIBLIO L).]

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES