Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to Practice Guide Table of Contents

PG I(E)

Importance Of Preparing For Those Evidentiary Questions Which Are Governed By EC 403.

EC 403 provides substantial rights which are extremely useful to criminal defendants. In this regard, EC 403 requires the court to make a finding concerning certain foundational facts before some types of evidence may be admitted. Moreover, and perhaps more importantly, EC 403 also allows a party to obtain an instruction to the jury that it may disregard the evidence if it finds that a sufficient foundation has not been laid. Thus, as will be explained below, counsel should always consider the applicability of EC 403 in preparing for trial.

By its express terms, EC 403(a) provides that “proffered evidence is inadmissible” unless the court makes preliminary findings of sufficient foundational facts in the following areas: (1) relevancy; (2) personal knowledge of the witness; (3) the authenticity of a writing; and (4) whether or not a hearsay statement is authentic (i.e., actually made by the person alleged to have made it.) Thus, prior to trial, counsel should determine whether any of the government’s evidence requires a foundational showing in the described areas. If so, the defense can request the court to determine the admissibility of the evidence in a hearing outside the presence of the jury. (EC 402(b).) In this way, counsel can ensure that the jury is not tainted by evidence which the court excludes for lack of foundation.

Assuming that the court allows the admission of the government’s evidence, EC 403 nonetheless authorizes the jury to conclude that a sufficient foundation does not exist. Thus, upon the defendant’s request, the court is required to “instruct the jury to determine whether the preliminary fact does exist.” (EC 403(c)(1).) Given this provision, counsel should prepare instructions prior to trial which will lay the framework for a closing argument which can persuade the jury to disregard portions of the government’s case. (See FORECITE F 2.001a for a discussion of subject areas upon which an instruction might be requested.)

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES