Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

SERIES 500 HOMICIDE

F 523 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime

TABLE OF CONTENTS
F 523.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties
F 523.1 Inst 1 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Title
F 523.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant

F 523.2 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]

F 523.3 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]

F 523.4 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Burden Of Proof Issues
F 523.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements

F 523.5 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]

F 523.6 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Defense Theories [Reserved]

F 523.7 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]

F 523.8 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]

F 523.9 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]

F 523 NOTES
F 523 Note 1 Hate Crimes: Constitutionality (PC 422.7)

Return to Series 500 Table of Contents.


F 523.1 Titles And Identification Of Parties

F 523.1 Inst 1 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Title

See generally FORECITE F 200.1.2 Note 2, CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-002, CCM-003, and CCM-004.


F 523.1 Inst 2 Identification Of Prosecution And Defendant

See generally FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-005 and CALCRIM Motion Bank # CCM-006.


F 523.2 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Tailoring To Facts: Persons, Places, Things And Theories [Reserved]


F 523.3 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Language That Is Argumentative, Confusing, Etc. [Reserved]


F 523.4 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Burden Of Proof Issues


F 523.4 Inst 1 Relating Prosecution Burden To Enumerated Elements

See FORECITE F 400.4 Inst 1.


F 523.5 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Elements And Definitions [Reserved]


F 523.6 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Defense Theories [Reserved]


F 523.7 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Preliminary Fact Issues [Reserved]


F 523.8 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Unanimity/Duplicity/Multiplicity [Reserved]


F 523.9 First Degree Murder: Hate Crime—Lesser Offense Issues [Reserved]


F 523 Note 1 Hate Crimes: Constitutionality (PC 422.7)

In Wisconsin v. Mitchell (93) 508 US 476 [124 LEd2d 436; 113 SCt 2194], the Supreme Court upheld the Wisconsin hate crime statute which is similar to the California statutes. In In re M. S. (95) 10 C4th 698, 724-26 [42 CR2d 355], it was held that PC 422.7 is not constitutionally overbroad under Mitchell even though it may be applied to “expression-based” misdemeanors such as PC 415. The reasoning for this holding was that the statute does not impinge on freedom of expression, but rather increases punishment for misdemeanors motivated by prohibited biases. In such case, the conduct is punishable in the first instance, if at all, for reasons unrelated to its expressive content. People v. MacKenzie (95) 34 CA4th 1256, 1267-69 [40 CR2d 793], held that PC 422.7 does not violate the defendant’s constitutional rights to free speech, due process or equal protection.

A crime does not qualify as a hate crime merely because it was committed in whole or in part because of the gender or disability of the victim. Such an offense can qualify as a hate crime only if the defendant also acts on some animosity or other biased motivation toward the victim’s gender, disability, or other protected characteristic. (88 Ops.Cal.Atty. Gen. 141.)

RESEARCH NOTE: For additional information on hate crimes, see Should Hate Be Punishable (The Recorder, December 28, 1992) and For ACLU, Hate Crimes Are a Divisive Issue (The Recorder, December 28, 1992).

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES