SERIES 200 POST-TRIAL: INTRODUCTORY
F 226 NOTES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
F 226 Note 1 Witness Credibility: Irrelevant Factors Should Be Deleted
F 226 Note 2 Bias Of Police Witness Re: Forfeiture And Possession For Sale
F 226 Note 3 Witness Credibility: Pretrial Silence as to Exculpatory EvidenceC Foundational Facts
F 226 Note 4 Unavailability of Witness
F 226 Note 5 Witness Bias: Test For Violation Of Sixth Amendment Right To Confrontation
F 226 Note 6 Witness Credibility: Coerced Testimony Of Third Party
F 226 Note 7 Witness Credibility In Sexual Assault Cases: The Defendant Is Entitled To Attack The Credibility Of The Complainant With All Relevant Impeaching Evidence
F 226 Note 8 Witness Credibility In Sexual Assault Cases: Properly Applied, The Fresh Complaint Rule Allows For The Admission Of A Very Limited Class Of Evidence
F 226 Note 9 Witness Credibility: Showing Of Reliability Required For Admission Of Prior Threat Of Injury Per EC 1370
F 226 Note 10 Witness Competency: Must Be Challenged At Trial; Burden Of Proof
F 226 Note 11 Witness Competency: Disabilities
F 226 Note 12 Witness Disability: Leading Questions
F 226 Note 13 Character For Truthfulness Or Untruthfulness Not Applicable to Mental Disorder Evidence
F 226 Note 14 Failure To Give “Witness Willfully False” Instruction As Reversible Error
F 226 Note 15 Witness Character For Honesty Or Truthfulness
Return to Series 200 Table of Contents.
F 226 Note 1 Witness Credibility: Irrelevant Factors Should Be Deleted
See FORECITE F 105 Note 1.
F 226 Note 2 B Bias Of Police Witness Re: Forfeiture And Possession For Sale
See FORECITE F 105 Note 2.
F 226 Note 3 Witness Credibility: Pretrial Silence As To Exculpatory Evidence—Preliminary Facts
See FORECITE F 105 Note 3.
F 226 Note 4 Unavailability of Witness
See FORECITE F 105 Note 4.
F 226 Note 5 Witness Bias: Test For Violation Of 6th Amendment Right To Confrontation
See FORECITE F 105 Note 5.
F 226 Note 6 Witness Credibility: Coerced Testimony Of Third Party
See FORECITE F 105 Note 6.
F 226 Note 7 Witness Credibility In Sexual Assault Cases: The Defendant Is Entitled To Attack The Credibility Of The Complainant With All Relevant Impeaching Evidence
See FORECITE F 105 Note 7.
F 226 Note 8 Witness Credibility In Sexual Assault Cases: Properly Applied, The Fresh Complaint Rule Allows For The Admission Of A Very Limited Class Of Evidence
See FORECITE F 105 Note 8.
F 226 Note 9 Witness Credibility: Showing Of Reliability Required For Admission Of Prior Threat Of Injury Per EC 1370
See FORECITE F 105 Note 9.
F 226 Note 10 Witness Competency: Must Be Challenged At Trial; Burden Of Proof
See FORECITE F 105 Note 10.
F 226 Note 11 Witness Competency: Disabilities
See FORECITE F 105 Note 11.
F 226 Note 12 Witness Disability: Leading Questions
See FORECITE F 105 Note 12.
F 226 Note 13 Character For Truthfulness Or Untruthfulness Not Applicable to Mental Disorder Evidence
See FORECITE F 105 Note 13.
F 226 Note 14 Failure To Give “Witness Willfully False” Instruction As Reversible Error
See FORECITE F 105 Note 14.
F 226 Note 15 Witness Character For Honesty Or Truthfulness
See FORECITE F 105 Note 16.
