Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

SERIES 100 PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS

F 100.5 CLOSING ARGUMENTS

TABLE of contents
F 100.5 Inst 1 Reference To Rebuttal Arguments
F 100.5 Inst 2 (a-c) Pretrial Introduction And Definitions: Alternative Instructions
F 100.5 Note 1 Prosecutorial Misconduct: Improper Comment On Willingness Of Witness To Testify As Opposed To Defendant

Return to Series 100 Table of Contents.


F 100.5 Inst 1 Reference To Rebuttal Arguments

*Add at end of CC 100, paragraph 4:

The prosecution will be allowed to make a rebuttal final argument since they bear the burden of proof.

Points and Authorities

CALCRIM 100 is incomplete because it fails to mention rebuttal argument.

Identification Of Parties—See FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1.

WARNING! Federal constitutional claims may be lost without proper federalization.—To preserve federal claims, counsel should add the applicable constitutional provisions and authority to the above points and authorities and explain how those provisions will be violated under the circumstances of this case.

Potential constitutional grounds for this request include, but are not limited to:

FORECITE CG 2.2 [Burden Of Proof: Elements And Essential Facts]

In death penalty cases, additional federal claims should be added including, but not limited to, those in FORECITE CG 13.


F 100.5 Inst 2 (a-c) Pretrial Introduction And Definitions: Alternative Instructions

Alternative a:

PRETRIAL INTRODUCTION

What I will now say is intended to serve as an introduction to the trial of this case. It is not a substitute for the detailed instructions on the law which I will give to you at the close of the case and before you retire to deliberate on your verdict. During the trial and beginning with these preliminary instructions you will hear me use a few terms which you may not have heard before. Let me now briefly explain a few of the most common to you. You will sometimes hear me refer to “counsel.” “Counsel” is another way of saying “lawyers” or “attorneys.” I will sometimes refer to myself as the “court.” The prosecution and the defendant are sometimes called the “parties” to this case.

When I “sustain” an “objection,” I am excluding that evidence or argument from this trial for good reason. Do not guess what the answer might have been. Do not speculate as to the reason for the objection. Do not assume to be true any insinuation suggested by a question asked a witness. A question is not evidence and may be considered only as it enables you to understand the answer. When you hear that I have “overruled” an objection, I am permitting that evidence or argument to be admitted. When we say “admitted into evidence” or “received into evidence,” we mean that this particular statement or this particular exhibit is now part of the trial and may be considered by you in making the decisions you must make in this case.

The term “burden of proof” or “sustaining its burden of proof” means the obligations of proving its case—in this trial—the prosecution’s obligation to produce proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Alternative b:

DEFINITION OF EVIDENCE

You are instructed that “evidence” is whatever is admitted in the trial of the case as a part of the record, whether it be an article or document marked as an exhibit, or other matter formally introduced and received, a stipulation of the testimony of witnesses, in order to enable you to pronounce with reasonable certainty concerning the truth of any matter in dispute.

Alternative c:

IMPARTIALITY IN CONSIDERING EVIDENCE

You must consider and decide this case fairly and impartially. You should not be prejudiced for or against a person because of that person’s race, religion, political or social views, wealth or poverty. You should not even consider such matters. Alsodo not let bias, sympathy, prejudice, or public opinion influence your decision.

Points and Authorities

PC 1122(a) requires general instruction, prior to the opening statements, concerning the jury’s “basic functions, duties, and conduct.” (See People v. Carter (2003) 30 C4th 1166, 1199 [failure to admonish per PC 1122 was error].) The above instructions provide needed context and explanation of legal terms so that subsequent pretrial instructions on the jury’s functions, duties and conduct will be more fully understood by the jury. (See Devitt, et al., Fed. Jury Prac. & Instr. (1992) §10.01, p. 253-54 and CJ 1.02; Deering’s EC 350, Suggested Forms; see also FORECITE CHK V for examples of instructions which may be required by PC 1122(a).)

Identification Of Parties—See FORECITE F 100.2 Note 1.

WARNING! Federal constitutional claims may be lost without proper federalization.—To preserve federal claims, counsel should add the applicable constitutional provisions and authority to the above points and authorities and explain how those provisions will be violated under the circumstances of this case.

Potential constitutional grounds for this request include, but are not limited to:

FORECITE CG 2.2 [Burden Of Proof: Elements And Essential Facts]
FORECITE CG 7.3 [Consideration Of Matters Not Admitted Into Evidence]
FORECITE CG 7.4 [Juror Consideration Of Evidence For An Improper Purpose]
FORECITE
CG 7.5 [Fair And Unbiased Jury]

In death penalty cases, additional federal claims should be added including, but not limited to, those in FORECITE CG 13.


F 100.5 Note 1 Prosecutorial Misconduct: Improper Comment On Willingness Of Witness To Testify As Opposed To Defendant

People v. Guzman (2000) 80 CA4th 1282, 1290 held that a prosecutor’s repeated references to a witness’s willingness to testify impliedly compared the witness to the defendant, who did not testify, and constituted error under Griffin v. California (1965) 380 US 609 [14 LEd2d 106; 85 SCt 1229]. The Court pointed out the distinction between comments directed at the defense’s failure to present evidence, at the defendant’s silence, and admitted that “prosecutors must walk a fine line when treading in this area.”

RESEARCH NOTE: Violation of federal constitutional rule (Griffin v. California) prohibiting adverse comment by prosecutor or court upon accused’s failure to testify, as constituting reversible or harmless error, 24 A.L.R.3d 1093, supp sec. 10.

CALJIC NOTE: See FORECITE F 2.60 n9.

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES