Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to CALJIC Part 9-12 – Contents

F 9.24 n1 “Lawful Arrest” Defined: Exigent Circumstances, Consent, Knock-Notice Vis a Vis Arrest In Home (PC 69, PC 148(b), PC 148(c), PC 148(d), PC 243(c), PC 243.1, PC 245(b), PC 245(c), PC 245.2, PC 245.3, PC 245.5, PC 417(c)).

In People v. Wilkins (93) 14 CA4th 761, 777, 779-80 [17 CR2d 743], the court held that when appropriate under the facts, the court must supplement the CALJIC instruction on lawful arrest (CJ 9.24, CJ 16.104) to include instruction upon the principles of exigent circumstances, consent, and the knock-notice requirements of PC 844.


F 9.24a

Warrantless Searches/Arrests Within The Home

Are Per Se Unreasonable Absent Exigent Circumstances

(PC 69, PC 148(b), PC 148(c), PC 148(d), PC 243(c),

PC 243.1, PC 245(b), PC 245(c), PC 245.2,

PC 245.3, PC 245.5, PC 417(c))

Add the following to CJ 9.24 when appropriate:

A warrantless [search] [arrest] within the home is per se unreasonable in the absence of exigent circumstances.

Points and Authorities

CJ 9.24 omits the principle that warrantless searches/arrests within the home are per se unreasonable in the absence of exigent circumstances. It erroneously represents to the jury the boundaries of a lawful arrest. (See e.g., People v. Ramey (76) 16 C3d 263, 275-76 [127 CR 629].) The issue of reasonable cause for an arrest is a question of fact for jury determination. (People v. Curtis (69) 70 C2d 347, 359 [74 CR 713]; see also People v. Wilkins (93) 14 CA4th 761, 777, 779-80 [17 CR2d 743].) Hence, the jury should be instructed upon this principle.

Failure to adequately instruct the jury upon matters relating to proof of any element of the charge and/or the prosecution’s burden of proof thereon violates the defendant’s state (Art. I, § 15 and § 16) and federal (6th and 14th Amendments) constitutional rights to trial by jury and due process. [See generally, FORECITE PG VII(C).]

NOTES

[Additional briefing on this issue is available to FORECITE subscribers. Ask for Brief Bank # B-569.]


F 9.24b

Apparent Effort To Avoid Police Officer Does Not Alone Justify Detention

*Add to CJ 9.24 when appropriate:

See FORECITE F 16.108b.

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES