Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to CALJIC Part 9-12 – Contents

F 10.23 n1  Unlawful Sodomy: Consent and Unconsciousness. 

For additional issues regarding consent and unconsciousness, see FORECITE F 10.02 et seq.


F 10.23 n2  Rape Of Spouse:  Unconsciousness And Fraud – “Fraud In Fact” As Issue For The Jury. 

In the July 1994 pocket part, CALJIC modified this instruction to comport with the 1994 statutory revision regarding unconsciousness and fraud.  The accompanying use note suggested that whether there was “fraud in fact” is “a legal issue for the court.”  This observation is erroneous.

The statute expressly predicates liability upon “the perpetrator’s fraud in fact.”  Because this is a requisite element of the charge, it cannot be a legal question for the court.  (See FORECITE PG VII(C).)  Failure to require a jury determination of every element of the offense violates the defendant’s rights to trial by jury and due process.  (Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments; see People v. Cummings (93) 4 C4th 1233, 1312-14 [18 CR2d 796].)


F 10.23a

Unlawful Sodomy: Actual Penetration Required

*Modify CJ 10.23 as follows:

(See FORECITE F 10.20e.)

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES