Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to CALJIC Part 5-8 – Contents

F 8.81.11a

Murder Of Judge/Prosecutor, Etc: Intent To Kill Required

 

(PC 190.2(a)(11) & PC 190.2(a)(12))

*Modify ¶ 3, lines 1-2 of CJ 8.81.11 to provide as follows [added language is capitalized; deleted language is between <<>>]:

2.             The __________ was <<murdered>> INTENTIONALLY KILLED …

Points and Authorities

Proposition 115 amended PC 190.2(a)(11) and PC 190.2(a)(12) to require an intent to kill when a judge or prosecutor is killed.  These Amendments correct the anomaly between these and other special circumstances by adding the intent to kill requirement.

Since this Amendment benefits the defendant, it must be applied to all cases not yet final when Proposition 115 was enacted on June 6, 1990.  (Tapia v. Superior Court (91) 53 C3d 282, 297-99 [279 CR 592]; People v. Rossi (76) 18 C3d 295, 299-302 [134 CR 64].)

Failure to adequately instruct the jury upon matters relating to proof of any element of the charge and/or the prosecution’s burden of proof thereon violates the defendant’s state (Art. I, § 15 and § 16) and federal (6th and 14th Amendments) constitutional rights to trial by jury and due process.  [See generally, FORECITE PG VII.]

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES