Logo
Searching Tips

When searching Forecite California, there are shortcuts you can take to find the information you are looking for:

1. By Code Section:

Forecite uses standard abbreviations for different types of codes. Those abbreviations can be found below:

Codes:
CCR California Code of Regulations
Corp C Corporations Code
EC Evidence Code
FG Fish and Game Code
GC Government Code
HN Harbors & Navigation Code
HS Health & Safety Code
PC Penal Code
RT Revenue & Tax Code
VC Vehicle Code
WI Welfare & Institutions Code

Using these codes to search is very simple. For example, if you wanted to search for Penal Code section 20, you would type PC 20 into the search box.

2. By CALJIC Number:

Since Forecite is indexed to CALJIC, searching for CALJIC numbers is easy. For example, to search for CALJIC 3.16, you would type 3.16 into the search box.

3. By Case Name or Citation:

To find a case or citation, simply enter all or part of the case’s citation. Since many cases are known only by one name involved, it is often helpful to not search for the entire citation. For example, if you were searching for references to People v. Geiger (84) 35 C3d 510, 526 [199 CR 45], you could search for People v. Geiger or just Geiger. Searching for Geiger might be more helpful since it would find references to the case that do not include the full citation.

  • Contact Us
  • Log In
  • My Account

  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profiles
  • Practice Areas
  • Verdicts & Settlements
  • News & media
  • Blog
  • Contact

Back to  Previous Page
Back to top

Return to CALJIC Part 3-4 – Contents

F 4.21.1 n1  Voluntary Intoxication:  General And Specific Intent Crimes.

In People v. Aguirre (95) 31 CA4th 391, 392-402 [37 CR2d 48], the court held that CJ 4.21.1 does not violate the defendant’s substantial rights under PC 1259.  The court rejected the defendant’s arguments that the instruction was confusing, inaccurate and shifted the prosecution’s burden of proof.


F 4.21.1 n2  Instructing Jury That Intoxication Cannot Negate Malice As Reversible Error. 

In People v. Nava UNPUBLISHED (B078100), the trial court erroneously included 2nd degree implied malice murder in that portion of CJ 4.21.1 which precludes consideration of intoxication.  The Court of Appeal held that this was reversible error.  [The opinion and briefing in Nava is available to FORECITE subscribers.  Ask for Opinion Bank # O-184 and Brief Bank # B-644.]


F 4.21.1 n3  Rape: Belief As To Consent — Jury Should Consider Defendant’s Intoxication. 

(See FORECITE F 10.00 n10.)

  • Register as New User
  • Contact Us
© James Publishing, Inc. (866) 72-JAMES